User talk:Gretchen888

August 2009
Those references are valid, simply going to those sources and checking would show that the information is factual. Besides that, by that criteria everything else on that page should be deleted because NOTHING else is referenced at all. Quit pretending this is a reference issue. If you do not like the way something is worded then change the wording. If you really just don't want the info on there, which I think is what the problem is, then we are going to be doing this for awhile. I don't agree that it shouldn't be on there, if there is information about the kappa, any information, it should have a place here. This page is very short and people interested in the kappa may be interested in what effects or appearances it has made in media or pop culture. In addition, there may be more appearances made by the kappa in other entertainment and with more information. Keeping this section in there encourages people to include that information. Now up to this point I have been willing to compromise. I have gotten better sources, two of which are primary. The other allows a quick check with funimation's official site to show that this scene actually took place. I have removed the quote and attempted to make the wording better as well. Now, the civil thing to do would be to try and work something out rather than just deleting it because you don't like "trivia." You don't have any more authority over this page than I do, so try to play a little nicer, ok?Gretchen888 (talk) 15:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. --DAJF (talk) 23:33, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --DAJF (talk) 04:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been blocked from editing for  in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.  The duration of the block is 24 hours. Here are the reverts in question.

You should also participate on the article talk page when your block expires William M. Connolley (talk) 16:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)