User talk:Gretlina

Welcome!
Hello, Gretlina, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorials
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -- VViking Talk Edits 18:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022


Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.-- VViking Talk Edits 18:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Please can you clarify how the external links I added were in any way inappropriate. They were to impartial content that clarified the topic. Not spamming at all, and not related to SEO. The page is in dire need of several updates. If it's useful I can find several brands as reference to the same citations to demonstrate neutrality... but either way the topics should be cited rather than left as they are. The page is not informative or helpful as it stands! Gretlina (talk) 18:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Why on earth did you undo my previous edits?! They included no links whatsoever! Gretlina (talk) 18:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Please review Reliable Source, both of the external links you added were to corporations who sell services related to the article, this is spam. Reliable sources would be from travel magazines, newspapers, journals on what the insurance is. Not from companies that sell the services.-- VViking Talk Edits 18:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Right but even my last edits have been undone, and they contained no additional links whatsoever. For reference both existing links on the page are heavily invested in the topic too, and have affiliate links on their pages. Gretlina (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Also regarding the Reliable sources page it does also state:
 * Common sources of bias include political, financial, religious, philosophical, or other beliefs. Although a source may be biased, it may be reliable in the specific context. When dealing with a potentially biased source, editors should consider whether the source meets the normal requirements for reliable sources, such as editorial control, a reputation for fact-checking, and the level of independence from the topic the source is covering.
 * A couple of links I published (such as the worst healthcare in the world) is totally impartial and not actually linked to a product or sales of that product.
 * https://www.william-russell.com/blog/countries-worlds-worst-healthcare/
 * Why would that not be permissible when describing the inadequacies of some healthcare systems. It's perfectly relevant and impartial. Gretlina (talk) 18:31, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Last warning; you need to supply reliable sources to add new material
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:40, 19 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Let me get this straight. I've actually contributed to this page in a meaningful way, and you have now undone that work and re-added a source that clearly has affiliate advertising in insurance BACK into the page, whilst telling me I've used poor sources.. Have you even read the contributions!?!?! Gretlina (talk) 17:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Have you read WP:Reliable sources and WP:Verifiability? OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:William Russell Limited
Hello, Gretlina. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William Russell Limited, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:William Russell Limited


Hello, Gretlina. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William Russell Limited".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:26, 16 February 2023 (UTC)