User talk:GreyHatBilla

RFC?
How to open the RFC on talk page of an article?
 * Full instructions are available at WP:RFC. Yunshui 雲 水 08:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

thanks GreyHatBilla (talk) 09:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Faizan (talk) 13:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

defending against Sockpuppet claims
Someone please copy paste my this appeal there in

I've been blocked for without any reason, and even without informing me one of the admin has block my IP. The check user has yet not completed the investigation still I have been blocked by rude administrator : FPIS. So I can't defend myself against those claims there at SPI. Please paste this there in SPI.

"look first of all, user page is indeed necessary to create if you are an Wikipedian. I created that and I am not a biased editor like you two three boys @[Mar4d, Faizan]. Its obvious that the article which I like i will edit them first, though I have made constructive and useful contributions like in F-INSAS Special Forces of India and in Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 ..... Etc. And stop making personal attacks @ [Mar4d, Faizan], I am a new editor, you should have checked my contributions before pointing finger on me. " GreyHatBilla (talk) 15:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I wanna start an RFC for Kargil War for mentioning Decisive Indian Victory in the infobox as per as sources. As I'm a new editor I was not knowing that how to open an RFC. So I asked for an administrator. What's been wrong in this @ User:Faizan ?GreyHatBilla (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I am blocked so I can't comment there at SPI. So I mentioned you here GreyHatBilla (talk) 15:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I Am Not a Sock User

 * A new user who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, may be subject to the remedies applied to the user whose behavior they are joining. Note that admins cannot see personally-identifying information (such as IP or geolocation) and have to rely on behavioural evidence. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 17:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Admins CAN NOT see your IP, location, or any other personally-identifying information. I told you this before. And a Checkuser (who can see such evidence, but cannot publicly reveal it) will not run a check absent evidence, so the fact that a Checkuser was willing to run a check in the first place suggests the behavioural evidence is convincing enough that you are a sock of KnightWarrior25. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 16:37, 1 August 2015 (UTC)