User talk:Greyhound Trust (National Charity)

re your edit - I have undone your edit due to the fact that you removed everything that you did not like. The page is an article and not a company website page and must therefore contain encyclopedic information and that includes the recent controversy (which is referenced). The mission statement etc is not relevant but I have added some of your terminology changes. I have not posted a warning on your talk page due to the fact that some of the edits are ok. Please refrain from removing paragraphs or sentences that have a citation. Racingmanager (talk) 16:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm ApricotFoot. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Greyhound Trust have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please note your edits has contravened multiple Wikipedia practices, firstly you have removed chosen sentences with valid references, second you have changed figures without providing a valid reference, and finally based on your user name there seems to be a possibility that you are editing an article on an organisation that you are involved with, which brings NPOV into play. ApricotFoot (talk) 16:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)