User talk:GriffinKemp97

Welcome!
Hello, DasEsArts, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ryan Hurst (UK), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! red dogsix (talk) 15:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Ryan Hurst (UK)


The article Ryan Hurst (UK) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dogsix (talk) 15:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. This is mainly because the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy, but in addition it is clear from both your editing and your username that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. If you would like to have a personal account in order to make useful contributions about some topic other than your organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below.

Before making any unblock request, you should read the guide to appealing blocks. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * You can't write on 's talk page, but you can WP:ping him (I am pinging him now: ).  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It would appear from this Twitter link that dasEsArts is Ryan Hurst's outfit. Favonian (talk) 20:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the help and for unblocking. I will change username immediately. (By the way, blocked for "self promotion", is what came up in the warning box. No worries.
 * Are you sure? It should have said "Using Wikipedia for promotion, and username policy violation", with no mention of "self promotion". I have checked by logging into an account which was blocked with exactly the same block that I gave you, and sure enough there was no mention of the word "self" in the resulting notice. I can't imagine any reason why the software would have inserted that word into a notice relating to a block where there was no use of the word in the block log reason, let alone any reason why it would do it for your account and not for another one with an identical block. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryan Hurst (UK)


A tag has been placed on Ryan Hurst (UK) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red dogsix (talk) 15:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ryan Hurst (UK) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Hurst (UK) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ryan Hurst (UK) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 19:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)