User talk:GriffinSeyfried

I reverted the edit you made to the Method article. The standard is you link to a concept once in an article and object class was already linked right at the beginning. That isn't a hard and fast rule and I could see a case made for linking again when we talk about class methods. But you didn't create the link correctly. It is always a good idea to look at the page after you edit, if the link is red as it was in this case then it's not a valid link. The linking can be kind of quirky, sometimes just getting capitalization wrong or having or not having a space can cause a red link. Not sure what the problem was here but it was definitely a red link so I just reverted back to the last good state. Using the link tool in the editor usually makes sure you link correctly. Also, it's a good idea to check the link after. Sometimes you may be linking to a homonym, or just an awful article that you don't want to direct people to or most common to a disambiguation page. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 15:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * One last thing: as I thought about it, I think you had a good idea, even though it is linked at the beginning another link when we talk about class methods is a good idea so I added it back but made sure that it was a valid link this time. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 18:14, 4 January 2015 (UTC)