User talk:GriffithsTorturer

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freeman High School shooting (December 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 94rain were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Freeman High School shooting and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Freeman_High_School_shooting Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:94rain&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Freeman_High_School_shooting reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

94rain Talk  07:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Indianapolis FedEx shooting, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 11:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, you may be blocked from editing. Euryalus (talk) 06:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Understood. As is the principle of truth. Is it not one’s choice to see or not to see? I think not. I think you’d agree. Whether or not you’d see the fallacy of your argument. Nor does mine precede. Hahahaahahahaha… GriffithsTorturer (talk) 07:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * (P.S. thanks for not deleting the whole motive I added on the Parkland shooting, as I was expecting that one to be gone because I didn’t cite sources). GriffithsTorturer (talk) 07:45, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The Parkland shooting motive that you added was garbage and not backed by reliable sourcing. You need to slow down and have a look at the five pillars.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 07:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * “Should conflicts arise, discuss them calmly on the appropriate talk pages, follow dispute resolution procedures, and consider that there are 6,765,409 other articles on the English Wikipedia to improve and discuss.” GriffithsTorturer (talk) 08:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * My friend, I am reliable sourcing. If you my problems persist, then a respective higher up may ban me. Otherwise, I will be honest in stating I have a level of apathy and boredom on the topic, and cannot promise to provide any “reliable” sources any time in the future. Postulation is indeed the base of all information and conceptual standpoints, and considering the extensive research I have done on mass murder, I’d personally argue—while understanding that this is not statistically or reasonably acceptable to expect others to accept—that I am one of the best researchers of this topic in the world, even more so than some first hand articles. I have as much knowledge on mass shootings and other terror attacks to surpass Adam Lanza himself in some people’s view if they knew what I knew, but my extensive arrogance and pontification is sure to be agitating and almost perceived as purposefully arrogant, so at the end of the day, I would simply ask you to be a little more patient, ban me if I get too annoying for you, and most of all, grasp that this is Wikipedia, and not the reliable sourcing you are looking for as inspiration. If someone is doing actual research on a topic, they will go to more places than the English Wikipedia. Sorry if I have not followed the guidelines that I did not look at up to this point for a reason mentioned prior in this paragraph that I do not intend to proof read. I have enough problems in my own life without worrying about the policies of this website. (And no the motive I added—at least the first part—was not garbage; he wasn’t very bright or complicated. If you knew yourself and could replace said motive with something better, then please enlighten me. Because I’m not too sure where your criticism is coming from at least on that point. Ban me whenever you feel the need). GriffithsTorturer (talk) 08:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Where is the source that says that Nikolas Cruz's motive was "fun and general grudges"? The motive field in the infobox should come only from the investigators. It should not come from media reports (which are often highly speculative) or from personal analysis.-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 08:45, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Investigators know about as much as you man. If I was placed in Marjory Stoneman Douglas after it happened, and proceeded to interview him and people from his past, as well as look at his history of behavior, that would be the pretty obvious conclusion I would come to. You got some dead teenagers there, and at the end of the day there are only so many ways the mind can direct itself in. I’d know his motive, and a few other details from one glance at da muthafucka and a short inspection of his eyes. I’m pretty smart. Hahahaahahahaha… GriffithsTorturer (talk) 09:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are smarter, you'll take note of what you have been told before you find yourself blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 09:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * What I have been told has been taken note of. GriffithsTorturer (talk) 09:55, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 10:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. jp×g🗯️ 10:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)