User talk:GrigorePintea

Help me!
Please help me with...1. The "no original research" policy. If the research is documented and proven valid, why not ? At least a "discussion" or "alternative view" paragraph should be allowed. Otherwise, everything is reduced to a compilation of other people's views, who can sometimes be outdated, incomplete or downright false.

2. Is there any way to know the authors of an article ? Where exactly the name or names do appear ?

3. If for instance I can prove that an allegation in one of the articles is false, do I have the right to signal the fact ? Or / and to change the text accordingly ? In fact, adding to or changing the text is conditioned by who's approval ? The author ? Slim chances. The Wikipedia leaders ?

Thank you in advance, GrigorePintea (talk) 02:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)G.P.


 * Well....
 * If the research is documented and proven valid, then it's not OR.
 * I assume you mean who has edited a page, in which case click the "View history" tab, or type in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=XYZ&action=history into the URL bar, where XYZ is the name of the article you wish to view.
 * Yes and yes, though don't be surprised if you get reverted. If that happens the matter should be discussed further on the talk page. There is no "central authority" at Wikipedia, so anyone is allowed to edit pretty much anywhere.
 * If you want more help, change the help me-helped back into a help me, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 02:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)