User talk:Grimini

theaircar.com vs. mdi
Please, visit www.theaircar.com, in the home you will find an important news where this point catches on: '...This being said any affirmation of fraud can be criminal and constitutes a serious fault of the truth of which the viability is being studied by our lawyers at this moment.'.

I think this is not the place for this discussion. User:Grimini 29 February 2008 (Talk | contribs)
 * I agree wikipedia is not the place to discus if the accusations are true or not. But mentioning that MDI accuses Celades is not the same as saying the accusations are true. Instead of removing the reference to the accusation, you could've added something like:
 * "In response to the statements made by MDI, a notice has appeared on the AirCar website disputing MDI's claims."


 * Next time, use the talk page of the article.V (talk) 17:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)