User talk:Grimmer101

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Manchester City F.C., did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Manchester City F.C. was changed by Grimmer101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874923 on 2010-12-16T10:16:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:16, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Skepta constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 10:17, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Osama bin Laden. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Velella  Velella Talk 10:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Carlos Tévez.  Velella  Velella Talk 10:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 10:34, 16 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Really? These are the last five edits made by this account, all within the past hour. BLP vandalism, Shittypedia, Manchester Shitty, More BLP vandalism, and finally, attacking another user and begging for a ban.  Besides, read WP:GOTHACKED. Courcelles 10:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

You have no evidence to back up your sarcastic remark, which is what your reply there instigates. All of the offences you listed, including the attack on another user, does not mean it was me personally. If you look at my wikipedia history, my account has been very clean from the very beginning and just today (as you said, within the last hour) has committed offences... your argument has no consistency, how can you deny my appeal with such strong sarcasm? as an administrator, you should know far better than to "lower yourself", think again, reconsider before replying. I look forward to it.
 * I notice that the useful edits on this account were in 2006. The account then went inactive for several years.  All of the 2010 edits are vandalism.  If this account has been hacked, then the person who is making unblock requests is almost certainly the hacker, not the original user. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Yet again, another unhelpful comment, you really aren't instilling confidence in the administrative community on wikipedia here. Just because i haven't actually edited anything for 4 years doesn't mean i've been completely inactive.. i still view wiki pages on a daily basis, and as previously mentioned leave my account logged in at my place of work, so my password has not been compromised. The recent password change was by myself, and i will ensure i log out of my account before leaving my workstation in the future. However is this even any use, from what i've seen so far, administrators seem to lack both common decency and sense. I refuse to create another account, and will leave wikipedia for good, you have lost a once committed member of the community and i have lost all faith in the structure and running of this site.
 * According to your contribution history, you contributed six useful edits, four years ago, and then fifteen acts of vandalism. I think Wikipedia can manage to carry on without you.  'Somebody else did it' is what about half of all vandals claim after they are blocked.  It's used so much we have a special page about it.  Most people claim it was 'my little brother,' but 'a coworker' is a frequent alternate person to blame. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:11, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for this. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact ArbCom at . Courcelles 12:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)