User talk:Grind History

May 2021
Hey again, I'm very sorry I reverted your edits to grindcore once again, but the problem with most of this edit, is that the sources you cite have to reflect the information you're including and the information has to be notable to the page. For example, obviously Napalm Death are a highly notable band in grindcore, but going into detail about each of their songs and how they were influenced, isn't important to understand grindcore. It may be important to understand those specific songs, but not the genre as a whole. Feel free to add that info to the song or album page though. Also, you citing sources that say that grind was influenced by crust and thrashcore does not equate to it being a fusion genre of the two. Especially seeing as both those genres were already listed as influencing it prior to your edits. I hope this clears some stuff up. I'm willing to help you further understand the runnings of Wikipedia if you'd like, as I understand it can be hard to follow. You can alternatively leave something on the article's talk page and I'm sure other editors would be willing to help you. I'm sorry, I don't want to get into any kind of conflict. Issan Sumisu (talk) 06:59, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Grindcore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 02:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Motörhead genre
You changed the main Motörhead genre to biker metal, which I reverted for three reasons.

First is that infobox genres should remain as generic as possible, as described at Template:Infobox musical artist.

Second is that genres on Wikipedia are derived from WP:SECONDARY sources, not from personal observations by Wikipedia editors, or even by band members. Whatever Lemmy said is not going to change the band's listed genre.

Third is that Wikipedia is a summary of the literature about a topic. The literature on Motörhead includes a lot of sources that do not mention biker metal. Sure, you can find biker metal if you are looking for it, but if you are looking at everything written about the band, biker metal comes in a distant fifth or sixth place. The instructions at Template:Infobox musical artist tell us that four genres are the maximum. We already have four genres listed. Binksternet (talk) 19:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Atavistic (band) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atavistic (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Atavistic (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 22:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Hazzard Dblon&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Hazzard Dblon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC) I have quoted from "Grind History" with respective authors reinforcing the information from "allmusic". I did not make any quotes from Hazzard Dblon not to confuse things.
 * Hey I just saw that I got tagged in this, and wanted to say that I had nothing to do with your block. It was done by one of the CheckUsers, not me. Issan Sumisu (talk) 06:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Talkpage access is revoked, since the page is being used as a forum to continue disruptive attacks on other editors. If you want to be unblocked, use your original account and formulate an unblock request that addresses your conduct and use of sockpuppets, and isn't devoted to your grievances.  Acroterion   (talk)   19:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)