User talk:GringisMan

Next General Election 2017.
Hi. Could you look at the para about Zac Goldsmith's campaign guy. It is either missing an 'and' or a 'who', and I don't know which. Ta. The joy of all things (talk) 18:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've changed the wording somewhat now. Does this make more sense? GringisMan (talk) 18:49, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes! Thank you. I am on the mobile so accessing citations isn't easy. I prefer talking to people direct rather than a tag. Thanks. The joy of all things (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

MLP
Good work on Marine Le Pen. That article is such a mess! Jdcooper (talk) 18:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to June 2017 London attack does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. ''I removed your addition of the Trump related material per consensus on the talk page. '' - MrX 18:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. SmartSE (talk) 12:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of David Wygant for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Wygant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Wygant until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)