User talk:Groceryheist/archive 1

Hello, Groceryheist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Everymorning  talk to me  02:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Tacocat


A tag has been placed on Tacocat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Introducing Myself
Hi this is Ben from COM528, not the professor Ben, the student Ben. 2ndFoundation (talk) 19:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Groceryheist, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 08:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Cyber-ethnography
cyber-ethnography looks good. If there's anything else you want to get in during the quarter, you should go ahead now or let me know that you're done. —m a k o ๛  22:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't think I'll make any more changes this quarter. I'll probably edit some more pages, because I do that sometimes. I still need to review another student's page for class.Groceryheist (talk) 17:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * AWesome. Thanks! —m a k o ๛  21:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Linda Burhansstipanov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Groceryheist! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 22:57, Wednesday, January 9, 2019 (UTC)

Potential Topics
I have started working on some brainstorming in my sandbox! I am really hoping to find an article revolving around the gaming community and or figures in the community that do not yet have articles. I am definitely in the early stages, but making some progress. Emileehelm (talk) 05:48, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Emileehelm, All the articles on your talk pages seem like potentially good choices. An article that is already a stub may be a safer choice because you will not have to demonstrate notability. That said, if you can find at least 2 or 3 reliable sources focusing on Draft:Timthetatman, I can see that working well. The person who previously tried to create that article didn't make a very strong effort. Starting a brand new article has its own challenges, but I think it is also easier in some ways and can be more rewarding.  No matter what article you choose, the most important thing is that you can find enough new information from reliable sources to support the addition of at least 3 paragraphs of content to Wikipedia. Groceryheist (talk) 01:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

COM 482 Topic
Hello, my name is Jay House. I would like to create an article on the Husky Sales Club at UW. There is no article on this topic already. Jhouse2 (talk) 00:35, 16 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi User:Jhouse2, I'm not sure if this is a good idea for an article or not. There are a few ways to go about finding out.  First, I would search Wikipedia for articles on comparable topics.  Does it seem like such clubs normally have articles about them?  Second, I would scan WP:Note (Wikipedia's notability policies) to see if you can find a justification that the article topic is notable and worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia. Since I think you are proposing an article about an organization, you should look at the specific notability criteria for organizations as WP:ORGCRIT. If both of these things work out then I would say you can do it, but if not then I suggest finding a new article.  My own suspicion is that this may be too niche of a topic, but I might be wrong. Groceryheist (talk) 00:47, 16 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Nate, I am now going to add to Halo Top Creamery as my article. Thanks!Jhouse2 (talk) 21:58, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

NJs Topic Proposal
Hey! I'm NJ, one of your students in COM482. I was maybe thinking about creating an article about the University of Washingtons Army ROTC program. Just because it was one of the first ROTC programs in the nation, has a rich history, has the most medal of honor recipients outside of a military school. I thought it would be interesting to create it because there are no articles on this topic already. nignaco (talk) 23:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi NJ, This is an interesting idea! I'm not 100% sure if this is a workable idea for article. There are a few ways to go about finding out.  First, I would search Wikipedia for articles on comparable topics. Does other ROTC programs have articles?  Second, I would scan WP:Note (Wikipedia's notability policies) to see if you can find a justification that the article topic is notable and worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia. Since I think you are proposing an article about an organization, you should look at the specific notability criteria for organizations as WP:ORGCRIT. If both of these things work out then it's probably a safe bet, but if not then I suggest finding a new idea. Groceryheist (talk) 18:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hey, so I decided to change my topic to the Supreme(brand) article. It is rated as a "start-class" with mid-importance. As a streetwear and fashion enthusiast, I would like to improve this article by expanding on their collaborations, their impact and influence on pop culture and the underground reselling business they sparked. nignaco (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi NJ, That sounds good to me. I've heard of Supreme_(brand) and I agree a lot can be improved and expanded. I don't see any mention of the reselling trend right now, so if you have reliable sources for that I can see it being a particularly nice addition.  I noticed that the page is semi-protected. This isn't a super big deal, but you should know what it means. Groceryheist (talk) 16:54, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Selecting a Topic
Hey Nate, I am creating a new section in the article, CollectivismCollectivism, on conflict. I want to add the tendencies people from this culture have when dealing with conflict and the decision making process they go through. This is a C-Class article, so there is a lot of editing and additions that need to be made. Also, this is a level-5 vital article, so it is an important article to edit. Jasmair (talk) 00:05, 17 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi User:Jasmair, this seems like a great topic to work on, but I do have one concern, which is that the article is quite developed already, with a fair amount of content and over 50 sources. Of course, I can see many possible ways that the article might be improved, including by reorganizing and revising content that is already there. I want to be 100% clear that for this project I want you to add new content and sources to an article. If you have a more specific idea about what content you will add, please let me know what you are thinking. Also start looking for sources for your project, you'll need to find at least 2-3 sources from which you can draw enough information for at least 3 paragraphs of content. Once you have these sources in hand, you can be totally sure this will be a workable project. Groceryheist (talk) 01:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hey User:Groceryheist, so I decided to change my topic. I started looking at articles and sources and realized that I would have had to connect research from different articles to come up with the information that I wanted to add (which is against Wikipedia standards of editing articles). Instead, I want to broaden my article to just Decision-making. There is no section on different decision-making styles, and from my research of 2-3 different sources, there are five different decision-making styles and I think that should be added to this article. Jasmair (talk) 00:47, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Jasmair, this seems like a pretty reasonable choice, especially since you have already identified some sources that provide content that you can add. But keep in mind what I said above about working on an article that is already fairly developed. Looking at that article in particular, it seems like quite a disorganized mess with many different sections on various ideas. I don't think should be a major concern for you right now, just something to be aware of.  Groceryheist (talk) 04:57, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Kitty's topic
Hi Nate, I am Kitty (Wu Sau Ying), and about my article topic, I don't have a topic that I will do for sure. I am thinking a computer game like LOL (League of Legends) or my idol Tiffany Young, but not for sure. I checked the page of LOL was quite empty so I decided to do it, and I think it will be fun. Wusauying


 * Hi Kitty, I checked the League of Legends page, and to me it seems like that article is quite developed already. Looking at the Talk Page I see that it was nominated for good article status, but was denied. To me this suggests that there is room for improvement to the article and it is being actively worked on.  Similarly, the article on Tiffany Young is C-class and I can see several people have recently edited it by looking at the history.  Working on an article that is already somewhat developed can be a bit more challenging, for various reasons.  It will be important for you to add some quality material that is well written and is not already in the article based on several reliable sources. There is an additional consideration in the case of Tiffany Young, since she's a living person you'll want to read and follow the special rules for  biographies of living persons.  I think either of these articles could work, I would make the decision based on whether or not you can find some reliable sources for information that you might add. Groceryheist (talk) 07:07, 18 January 2019 (UTC)


 * / Fair warning about League of Legends - that's a page that has been "over complete" in the past, as Wikipedia likes to leave gameplay details to specialized game wikis.  That's not to say there isn't room for improvement, but a lot of the improvement would be about things like the development and evolution of the game, the history of the game, marketing & sales, and so on.  Maybe work in spin-off articles like Riot Games or the various individual e-sports leagues.  There is not a lot of work left for describing the game itself, which the article already probably has "too much" detail on, so something like a list of champions and what they do is not in the cards (that used to exist and was deleted).  So if you're up for finding more sources like https://www.polygon.com/2016/9/13/12891656/the-past-present-and-future-of-league-of-legends-studio-riot-games and integrating them into the article, go for it, but that's the kind of content that is needed or could be added.  SnowFire (talk) 21:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Thanks for your advice, I really appreciate it.   has selected League_of_Legends_Pro_League for her article right now.  This seems in line with your suggestion to work on a particular e-sports league.  I'd greatly value any more of your comments. Groceryheist (talk) 23:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

COM 482 Introduction and Topic Suggestions
Hey Nate, I'm Tim a Communications major and Informatics minor in my last quarter at UW as an undergraduate. I was thinking of starting a new wikipedia page on a local alternative country band named 'The Hasslers' from Montana who have been on numerous tours and have played several festivals including Seattle's own Upstream festival. I was also thinking of doing a boxing-related page if that doesn't work out like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-two_combo which doesn't have any sources on its page and looks like it could use some editing. Any recommendations or tips would be helpful! Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmm113 (talk • contribs) 20:30, 18 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Tmm113, these are both interesting ideas for articles. For articles on bands see WP:Band for the notabiltiy criteria for musicians and ensembles. If you are confident that 'The Hasslers' meet the criteria based on reliable sources then I would feel comfortable with that choice.  One-two_combo is a part of WikiProject boxing. This seems like a reasonable candidate for an article, but I'm a little bit concerned that you may not find many that much novel information in reliable sources. I know very little about boxing, so I might not be right about this. Based on a glance at WikiProject boxing, I notice that most of their good articles are about boxers or films. If you are looking for more ideas you might try browsing  the list of project's stubs. Groceryheist (talk) 01:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hey Groceryheist, I have a couple books on boxing I might be able to dig out and find some information about One-two_combo but it might not be a lot of information I could flesh out. I think you're right because I'm having a hard time finding more sources online for reputable sources. I found another article of a Disney movie character Robin Hood (the fox) that hasn't been started yet: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robin_Hood_(fox)&action=edit&redlink=1 I found a lot of resources I could use to possibly start this page if this seems like a better option than my other proposals. Tmm113 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:47, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Tm113, I found an article on Wikipedia for that character Robin_Hood_(Disney_character). It is start-class and if you think you have enough reliably sourced information to support 2 or 3 paragraphs of new and expanded content, then I think this would be a doable project. Groceryheist (talk) 22:09, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

COM 482 Introduction
Hey Nate, this is Madeline J. I put my list of Article Selection Options in my sandbox, but I wanted to say I am leaning towards one of the Marie Kondo articles. Thanks! Mjohn55 (talk) 22:28, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi User:Mjohn55, I think either of the Marie Kondo articles is a good candidate for a topic. Marie Kondo is famous but has low quality Wikipedia pages.  I have only two concerns. My first concern is Kondo and her show are newly famous and you might have some trouble finding reliable sources with new information that is not already in the articles. So I suggest that you start looking for reliable sources and see if you can find enough material to support developing at least 3 new paragraphs of content.  My second concern only really applies to the Marie Kondo article, which is that since Marie Kondo is a living person, the article on her is subject to the  special Wikipedia policies for biographies of living persons.  If you choose to work on that article you should make sure to learn and follow that policy. Groceryheist (talk) 23:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Possible Articles for Expansion for COM 482
Hi Nate, my name is Alia and I'm a fourth year student at the University of Washington double majoring in Communications and Psychology. I'm still exploring topics I might want to choose for my article, but all of the articles I'm thinking of doing can be found in my sandbox. I'm interested in possibly pursuing a field in User-Centered design, so the first two articles I chose were design based. I'm also from Dubai, and since it's a fairly small and developing country, it's lacking in a lot of Wikipages. The last concept which relates to an article request also seems like an interesting topic. I'm unsure of if I'll be able to get enough journalistic sources for topics that aren't "science-related", but let me know if you think any of the topics seem like a good one to pursue. Alialm97 (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi User:Alialm97, any of those articles seems like a good candidate. They have all been around for some time, but have had little development, and they are related to your own personal interest. Another good reason to choose these articles is that they are categories of articles that are relatively under produced on Wikipedia. Since you are unsure if you'll have trouble finding good sources for a topic, that sounds like a good reason not to choose it. That said, I'm not sure I really agree that you'll have trouble finding sources for any of these topics in particular.  Why don't you spend some time looking for reliable sources for two or three of your favorite options (maybe one about Dubai and one about User-centered design).  If it seems like you can find enough (at least 2-3 reliable) sources for one of the topics then you can choose it. Groceryheist (talk) 23:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Yuang's Topic
Hey, this is Yuang. Right now I'm really interested in the Cultural Appropriation topic. The topic is really relatable to real-life and there are multiple resources that I may spend some time work on. At the same time, I want to expand this topic and introduce new materials. Thanks.Realyuang (talk) 06:29, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi User:Realyuang, this is certainly an interesting idea for a topic, but I am concerned because the article is already quite developed with a great deal of content and over 150 sources. While I can see many possible ways that the article might be improved, I also think best ways to improve the article would probably involve reorganizing and revising content that is already there rather than the addition of more examples. There will be some C-class articles that can be improved through the addition or expansion of a new section, but others that are relatively complete in terms of sections and content but that need more revision. Since the class project is built around you adding new content and sources to an article, I suggest that you consider another topic. That said, maybe you have a more specific idea about what content you will add.  If so, please just let me know what you are thinking. Groceryheist (talk) 23:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I decide to change my topic. I noticed that there's no wikipedia page for one of my favorite clothing brand KITH NYC, which is becoming more popular through many collaborations with other well-known brands. I definitely want to start up the wikipedia page for the brand KITH. Also, they have the wikipedia page for the founder of KITH so it may also help with collect some sources. Do you think it's a good idea? Thanks.Realyuang (talk) 04:21, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi realyuang. This sounds like an interesting and workable idea. When creating a new article you need to demonstrate the notabiltiy of the topic. Since you want to write an article about a company, you should review Wikipedia's special notability policies for organizations and companies and see if you can find sources that justify the notabiltiy of KITH NYC.  If you succeed then you will have a good topic for an article. Groceryheist (talk) 05:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Topic Proposal - Jay
This is Jay Cho from COM 482. As I've discussed with you previously, I think I'd like to expand and improve the stub article on Namuwiki. Namuwiki is the 7th most accessed website in Korea, and one of the very first search results that pop up in Korean Google searches in just about any given topic. It is a subculture based wiki, so it's not as concerned about sources as Wikipedia might, but it still is a very large scale wiki that the Wikipedia article doesn't expand too much on aside from its Gender Equality criticism section(which is sketchy on its own, with a dead link and somewhat biased news article as reference). Kanraru (talk) 20:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Jay, this seems like a good choice to me. I'm looking forward to seeing how you will be able to improve the article! Groceryheist (talk) 00:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Satory's Topic
Hi Nate, the two pages I am deciding between are Rap opera and SOB X RBE. I found both of these in the stub category and am really interested in both. Since both topics are becoming more popular, I think there will be a sufficient amount of sources. Satorymae (talk) 03:29, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Satorymae. These both look like great article choices. Take your pick! I'm really excited to see how you will improve these articles! Groceryheist (talk) 04:57, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Elisa's Topic Proposal
Hi Nate, this is Elisa. I've decided on improving the article on the Third Battle of the Isonzo. It's been listed as a start-class article, and is part of the WikiProject Military History. It is also part of the WikiProject Slovenia. Thus, I feel as though it is a good place to start. The Talk page says coverage and accuracy needs to be improved, so I was thinking of going more into detail on the page. Let me know if that works, thanks! Sunnysideup373 (talk) 20:45, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Sunnysideup373, this seems good to me! I'm excited to see how this develops! Groceryheist (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Topic Discussion
Hello! This is Nisha and I included some possible topics in my sandbox. I am leaning towards my first idea right now. Was wondering what you thought about it. At the moment, I am a little unsure about what to add to the current article for Sofitel, so I think that it might also be a good idea to create a new article for So Sofitel Bangkok entirely, as there isn't one yet. Please let me know what you think about this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nishaa19 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Nishaa19, I took a look at your talk page and I think that both of the ideas for the television shows sound good. Since your family operates a Sofitel hotel, you working on the article might be perceived as a  Conflict of Interest. Groceryheist (talk) 04:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Groceryheist What do you think about me editing the page about the clothing brand 'Everlane'? It is currently rated C-class and I think with this topic I can find more articles and information about it than the television show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nishaa19 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, that sounds pretty good to me. Good luck! Groceryheist (talk) 00:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Khanh's TOPICS
Hi! my name is Khanh Huynh and I'm one of the students in COM 482. This will be my last quarter as an undergraduate here. I'm still deciding on which article I would like to do. I want to do an article that would be relatable to real life. Meanwhile, I also want to expand on an existing article, like BMW M4. Thanks! Khuynh96 (talk)


 * Hi Khuynh96, I think the article on the BMW M4 could be a good choice for your article. The article is fairly developed already, with serval sections of content and over 10 sources. Of course, I can see many possible ways that the article might be improved and expanded, including by reorganizing and revising content that is already there. I want to be 100% clear that for this project I want you to add new content and sources to an article. If you can find additional sources with enough information to support 3 new paragraphs of content in the BMW M4 article then I think it's a good choice. Groceryheist (talk) 18:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Groceryheist, I recently moved my article out of my sandbox and into the mainspace. While I moved my article out of the sandbox, I also noticed a section with the same topic as my article (BMW M4). So, I went ahead and improved on that section of the article (BMW M4) as well. Is that possible for me to do? Thanks! Khuynh96 (talk) 11:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Original article: (BMW M4) My article: (F83 M4)

Potential Article Topic
Hi Nate!

This is Amy Tang, I am a student in you COM 482 class. I wanted to let you know about a few topics I am considering for my article.

The first topic is visual notetaking. There isn't an article on this topic, and I thought it would be interesting to write about. I'm currently in a research group where we are studying various visual notetaking methods and strategies. I enjoy the research we've been doing and thought it might be cool to do an article on it.

The second topic is technocreepiness. This is defined as creepy encounters or experiences with technology. I'm also in another research group where we focus heavily on analyzing literature and discussing creepy experiences. There isn't an article on this topic either, and I think it's very relatable to reality, as technology keeps advancing as we move forward in time.

Let me know what you think!

Amytangg (talk) 06:56, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Amy Tang — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amytangg (talk • contribs) 06:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Amytangg these both sound like interesting ideas for pages, I appriciate wanting to write articles about topics related to your research projects, but I still have a few concerns. There are many concepts in the academic literature that don't measure up to  Wikipedia's notability critieria so I want you to be sure that you can find enough reliable secondary sources for your article.  My second concern is that working on pages related to your own areas of research carries additional risks. You should be mindful of the policies on conflicts of interest and original research. If you have adequate sources to justify notability for one of these topics and you feel comfortable under the WP:COI then I say you can work on either page. Groceryheist (talk) 18:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Nate, I decided to do my research and article on visual note taking/sketchnoting. I mentioned in class on Thursday that I was having trouble finding credible secondary sources to conduct my research. I spent some time surfing the web and found some sources I was thinking on using. I would appreciate any kind of feedback on these sources, and will use your feedback in making my edits for Tuesday's peer review.


 * Sources:
 * http://showwithmedia.com/visual-notetaking/
 * https://www.scholastic.com/teachers/blog-posts/meghan-everette/visual-note-taking-keep-focus-and-improve-retention/
 * https://www.jetpens.com/blog/sketchnotes-a-guide-to-visual-note-taking/pt/892
 * https://pencils.com/guide-to-visual-note-taking/
 * https://affirmagency.com/visual-note-taking/
 * https://knowledgequest.aasl.org/sketchnoting-and-why-its-important/
 * "How to Start Sketchnoting" article by Veronica Erb, found on Academic Search Complete Research Database through UW libraries
 * "Embrace Your Inner Doodler! Join the Sketchnoting Revolution" article by Mary Ann Bell, found on Academic Search Complete Research Database through UW libraries


 * I was also wondering if using videos found on Youtube would be a credible source. These videos were very informative about the different kinds of techniques people could use...
 * Hope to hear from you soon.
 * Thanks!


 * Amytangg (talk) 08:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi {ping|Amytangg}, this seems great! I'm really excited to see how this article develops!  I'm not personally very familiar with standards around using videos as sources, but I found this explanatory essay which seems to offer some reasonable guidelines. Groceryheist (talk) 17:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Megan's Article Selection
Hello my name is Megan Joss, I have decided to create the article for Hello Molly, a clothing brand. After searching through articles that needed to be created on Wikipedia, I began to look at clothing sites and thought I would enjoy making the page for Hello Molly because I have shopped there before.


 * Hi Megan, this seems like a good idea for an article topic to me. I did a quick google news search and saw at least a few stories from what seem like reliable sources. I recommend that you check out WP:CORP, Wikipedia's notability policies for companies to help you use reliable secondary sources and to make it clear from your article that the subject is notable. Groceryheist (talk) 05:29, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Women’s History Wikithon, Washington State History Museum, Saturday 3/9
To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:14, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Art+Feminism, Jacob Lawrence Gallery, Saturday, April 6th, 1-5 PM
05:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

Seattle Wiknic 2019
04:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

Please join us for our Cascadia Wikimedians annual meeting, Monday, December 23, 5:30pm PST
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

Dunn–Bonferroni correction
Your participation at Talk:Dunn–Bonferroni correction regarding the page move you submitted is greatly appreciated. Ed 6767   talk!  16:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Great American Wiknic virtual edition 2020
04:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

Hello!
Hello! My name is Thao Nguyen. I am currently a Junior majoring in Communication and thinking about minoring in Philosophy. I am excited to learn more from this class about digital platforms. --Thaonguyen050300 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 05:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello! My name is Jiyenita Anastasia Angeline. I go by Angel and I am a Junior majoring in Communication. I just recently transferred from a community college and I am planning to minor in Informatics. I am excited to learn more in this class!--Jiyenita (talk) 05:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Thanks for sharing about yourself and your excitement about the class. Looking forward to working with you on your Wikipedia project this quarter! Groceryheist (talk) 20:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Greetings
Hello, my name is Isaiah Kang Jr. and I am an undergraduate senior finishing up me degree in Communications. Looking forward to the rest of this course!--Iskang15 (talk) 02:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

"Hi! My name is Pria Sundher and I'm a Senior majoring in Communication and minoring in Entrepreneurship. I'm excited to continue learning more about Wikipedia!"--Psun23 (talk) 17:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello! My name is Celine Chong and I am a second year Communication student planning to minor in Korean and hopefully informatics. I am really enjoying the course material so far and can't wait for what the remaining weeks contain! --11boba (talk) 00:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Greetings!
Hi, my name is Tyler Oliver and I am a junior in the communications major. Over quarantine I have spent a lot of time playing video games with a group of people I mostly met through random encounters online. I am from Tacoma, WA so I am not too far from campus but it doesn't feel the same being away from school and my friends. I have two large dogs, a Great Pyrenees named Andy and a Newfoundland named Maggie. I am excited to learn about different communities both online and in the real world and how they operate! TylerOliver7 (talk) 20:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi I am a big fan of big dogs as well! I have a big Golden Doodle named Cooper.  Thekevanator (talk) 15:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello
Hey, my name is Kevin Liu. I am a senior studying communication and entrepreneurship, as well as completing my Sales Certificate. I am a big Seattle sports fan, even though the Seahawks were just disappointing this year. I also was a sprinter on the UW Track and Field team, running the 100m, 200m and 4x100m. I'm super excited to learn more about this Wikipedia community! Thekevanator (talk) 15:48, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Heya!
Hi, My name is Kai. I'm a communication major, intending to minor in political science. I look forward to getting to know everyone!Kaig2000 (talk) 23:50, 14 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Kai! Nice to meet you. Veronica George 10 (talk) 21:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi!
My name is Lucy. I'm a junior com major minoring in Korean. This class is unlike anything I've taken at UW, and I'm excited to see what we're going to learn!! Lmc99 (talk) 05:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Nate!
Hello! My name Qania and I'm a senior in UW majoring in Communication. I'm an international student from Indonesia and that's where I'm currently residing right now due to the pandemic. This course seems really unique, yet intriguing so I can't wait to learn more of what's to come! Qaniaf (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi!
Hello! My name is Bri! I am a junior majoring in Communication, with a double minor in diversity and education, learning, and societies! I am looking forward to this course! Brierbach (talk) 20:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi!
Hi, my name is Veronica, and I'm a junior majoring in Journalism, with a minor in Visual and Media Arts. I'm also pursuing the sales certificate! I am really enjoying this course so far :) Veronica George 10 (talk) 21:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi
Hi! My name is Martina Povolo. I am a Sophomore majoring in Journalism and Public Interest Communication. I am excited to learn more about online communities! Martinapovolo (talk) 20:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi, my name is Jonathan Kvech. I am a senior majoring in Communication. So far I think this class is very interesting and have enjoyed learning about online communities, I am and am not a part of. I look forward, to learning more about wikipedia and online communities in general!Jonathan Kvech (talk) 06:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Cheers!!
Hey Nate! My name is Sarah Nicholson, and this is my last quarter at UW studying Communications and Cinema and Media Studies. So far I have really enjoyed getting to learn more about Twitch and Reddit as I use these platforms but I've never gone so in-depth about them which has been super fun :) Sarahhelennicholson (talk) 06:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

hello
Hi, my name is Noah. My hobbies include singing and dancing, as well as playing video games. I think this class is super fun because the cases are about things that are very present in my life! :) 2601:603:1A7F:1C50:CC7:7CEA:95EC:23EF (talk) 06:56, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi!
Hi Nate, this is Jeremy! I am a second-year majoring in communication. I would love to learn more about how to build a successful community, and I am excited to be a Wikipedian! --Zjhjeremy (talk) 07:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Message Confirmationg
Hello Nate,

My name is Kobey, and I am a sophomore studying Communication. I was able to get my account sorted out and ready to go. Looking forward to a great quarter!

LycheeJelly1 (talk) 05:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello!
My name is Mariana and i am a Junior and i am very excited for this course to learn more in depth on how exactly Wikipedia works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariana Madera (talk • contribs) 07:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello
My name is Reem Slim and I am currently a senior at UW majoring in Communication, minoring in English Writing, and getting my Professional Sales Certificate through the Sales Program. Excited to learn more! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reemslim (talk • contribs) 07:08, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Writing Black History of the Pacific Northwest into Wikipedia - Editathon 2021
Cascadia Wikimedians placed this banner at 03:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC) by using the Meetup/Seattle/Invitees list. To subscribe to or unsubscribe from messages from Meetup/Seattle, please add or remove your name here.

May 2022 Seattle meetup
23:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

CE suggestion
Hey Nathan,

On your UP: "I currently live in Seattle where I am was a PhD student" (emphasis mine). Suggest removing the "am".

Cheers. François Robere (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)


 * @François Robere thank you; thank you Groceryheist (talk) 16:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

500/30
Of course it applies to these talk pages:

The extended confirmed restriction is imposed on edits and pages related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland, broadly construed.



It was extended from just articles (May 2021) to all pages dealing with the topic (September 2021) *precisely* because the Icewhiz sockpuppetry and disruption spread from just articles and article talk pages to many other types of Wikipedia pages.

Can you please refrain from restoring abusive and racist comments by accounts which have been blocked and which are very likely sock puppets of an indef banned user? Not a good look. Thanks.  Volunteer Marek  15:50, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * My reading of WP:ARBECR is that the talk page exception is pretty broad allowing "constructive comments and edit requests related to articles in the topic area, provided they are not disruptive." Groceryheist (talk) 16:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't think those edits were constructive comments or edit requests? :-) I think this will come down to whether Signpost talk is an "internal project discussion" or not (is Signpost an independent newspaper hosted on enwiki or a WikiProject). Levivich (talk) 16:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023 Seattle meetup
04:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

Seattle Wiknic 2023
01:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)