User talk:GrognardJeff

Welcome!
Hi GrognardJeff! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 02:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: HMS Leander (1848) has been accepted
 HMS Leander (1848), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=HMS_Leander_(1848) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Dan arndt (talk) 06:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Clapp has been accepted
 Michael Clapp, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Michael_Clapp help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sulfurboy (talk) 00:49, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Clapp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commodore ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Michael_Clapp check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Michael_Clapp?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, GrognardJeff

Thank you for creating ARM Guadaloupe.

User:Eddie891, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Eddie891 Talk Work 12:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

my English language sources use both even when they are written by the same author. Is there a way to list it under both? ~
 * If it’s inconsistent, I’d suggest picking one ( preferably whichever seems to be more common) and sticking with it. I’m editing via phone but once I get to my computer I’ll go into a bit more detail about how to be clear in this situation. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, so I've redirected ARM Guadalupe to the same page and added a hatnote clarifying. For the article at its current title, I'd suggest an introduction along the lines of
 * "The Mexican Navy steam paddle frigate Guadaloupe (also known as the Guadalupe) was the flagship of the Mexican Navy..."
 * You should use one spelling throughout the article after that clarification, to avoid confusing the reader. If you think Guadalupe is more commonly used, move the page to ARM Guadalupe and flip the two words. Hopefully this helps, and if this doesn't make sense, feel free to ask me for clarification. Best wishes, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, GrognardJeff

Thank you for creating ARM Montezuma.

User:Eddie891, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Eddie891 Talk Work 12:42, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

still working on this article. Moctezuma seems to be a contemporary spelling that has been superceeded by Montezuma in most sources. Still working on refining my citations. Having repetitive strain issues so it may take me awhile. Thanks for the reviews. GrognardJeff (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries, thanks for your work! Eddie891 Talk Work 15:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)