User talk:Gronhev12

Jacinto João Garilho Gomes
Jacinto João Garilho Gomes (Mem Martins, 8 de fevereiro de 1998) é um futebolista português de 12 anos. Tem 1,66m e 48kg. Jacinto começou a sua carreira nas categorias de base da Academia Sporting Sintra. Em 2009 foi para o Mem Martins Sport Clube e com o da equipa foi jogar durante algum tempo na Foot 21. Em 2010, Jacinto Gomes foi ao seu primeiro Mundialito com a Foot 21 (como convidado). É importante realçar que o jogador faz parte da selecção e que mudou de avançado para defesa.

Academia Sporting Sintra
Aos dez anos de idade jogou nas categorias de base da Academia Sporting Sintra. Em 2009, Jacinto assinou com um clube local o Mem Martins Sport Clube, após dois anos no Mem Martins foi jogar nas categorias de base da Foot 21. Na Foot 21 fez uma única competição o " Mundialito " onde ficou pelos oitavos de final. O jogador marcou 2 golos pelo clube.

Mem Martins Sport Clube
Jacinto Gomes juntou-se aos outros jogadores do Mem Martins Sport Clube e conseguiu ir ao Mundialito no ano seguinte. Enquanto jogou no Mem Martins marcou 44 golos e foi Sub-Capitão. O último jogo na equipa foi contra o algueirão já a jogar a defesa.

Foot 21
No Mundialito, Jacinto começou a esforçar-se e a ter propostas do Sporting e do Benfica. Ele jogou como titular em todos o jogos que fez. O jogador esteve perto de assinar contracto com a Foot 21 só que surgiu a opurtunidade de jogar no Sporting, e ele não pôde recusar.

Sporting Clube de Portugal
Jacinto na época de 2010/2011 assinou pelo Sporting Clube de Portugal O jogador quer afirmar-se como extremo esquerdo (titular).

Millenium Team
Jacinto tem jogado na Millenium Team, onde ganhou a Danone Cup e vai representar Portugal na áfrica do sul. o jogador já marcou pela selecção "mais propriamente dita" 3 golos. Nesta equipa ele também foi há Copa Foot 21 onde ficou em quarto lugar.

Speedy deletion nomination of AF Lisboa Série 8
A tag has been placed on AF Lisboa Série 8 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Jacinto João Garilho Gomes
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page articlename to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. August 27, 2010 Auntof6 (talk) 01:03, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Your new articles
When you create an article on the English Wikipedia, please make sure that it is in English. Several articles that you created recently are in Portuguese. If these are not translated, they may be deleted. Thank you. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:509px-Herb Polski svg.png
Thanks for uploading File:509px-Herb Polski svg.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 09:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:4983004 dmNOn.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:4983004 dmNOn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 09:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:X435CATFJFX5.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:X435CATFJFX5.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.75.189 (talk) 16:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:4983016 ZSRYu.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:4983016 ZSRYu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.75.189 (talk) 16:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Reds Futebol Clube
A tag has been placed on Reds Futebol Clube, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 17:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Please also note that creating an article about a subject about which an article alrady exists is without merit, as yours will be deleted immediately. I suggest also that if you really wish to contribute to the English wikipedia, which I know is not your first language, you should ask a native English speaker to look at your work before you post it. Your spelling is not perfect. For example, the game is called football, not futebol.--Anthony.bradbury"talk" 21:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacinto João Garilho Gomes


A tag has been placed on Jacinto João Garilho Gomes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. De728631 (talk) 17:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacinto João Garilho Gomes
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jacinto João Garilho Gomes, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Akerans (talk) 21:00, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Portugese wikipedia
There is a wikipedia written in Portugese, with nearly 600,000 articles in it. I am sure that you would do much better working there until your English improves. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 22:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Por favor não contribua com textos em português na Wikipedia em inglês. Entretanto, suas contribuições serão muito bem-vindas na Wikipédia em português.

Please do not contribute text in Portuguese to English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at the Portuguese Wikipedia. Thank you. Andreas (T) 16:55, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mem Martins Sport Clube


The article Mem Martins Sport Clube has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 19:48, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:MMSC.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:MMSC.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 10 November 2012 (UTC)