User talk:Gronum

Welcome!
Hello, Gronum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Scopecreep (talk) 11:47, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Copyrighted contributions
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. Scopecreep (talk) 11:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of EM Software & Systems


A tag has been placed on EM Software & Systems requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mean as custard (talk) 12:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Notability
Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The existence of one article doesn't have any relevance for another article. (We might just not have caught up. I've tagged Ansys as sounding like an advert.) Both those articles have references and show some claim to notability. You only link to the company site, which does not comply with WP:RS, being neither reliable nor independent. (No company site is taken to be reliable - if you'd seen some of what I have seen you'd know why. We had someone trying to post about his multi-national group once. OK - more than once... The only traces of this group that we could find were a company that the same name as one part of the group, but which had a well established history and ownership, and a 'group website' and various offshoots. Totally bogus.) Anyway, you don't make a real claim to either significance or notability. Look at WP:CORP. This must be written to comply with WP:NPOV (neutral point of view - you were OK on that, but which I don't think Ansys is) and to avoid failing WP:SPAM. I've removed one version of the article as a duplicate. If there are any more than EM Software and Systems - S.A., would you please put at the top of them - sole editor request for deletion. We don't like to have more than one copy around. Causes confusion if one person edits one and someone else edits the other. Copy that with the brackets, and from the page window not the edit window - in the edit window I've put a 'nowiki' thing to stop it activating here. Over to you... Any questions, please ask at someone's talk page (we're mostly friendly and helpful) or put and a question at the page bottom here. 13:32, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Peridon (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:EM Software & Systems - S.A. Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:EM Software & Systems - S.A. Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 14:17, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Photo of EM Software and Systems main offices.png
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of EM Software and Systems main offices.png, which you've sourced to EMSS Properties. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)