User talk:Grosshigh


 * List of highest-grossing Telugu films

Gross Collections
Hello Grosshigh. I'm Political Cricketer. According to the sources, if India Today is to be trusted, then there is no controversy in Gabbar Singh gross collections. But by watching the sources of Magadheera and Dookudu you cannot confirm which movie grosses 1 billion first. I think it's better not to mantain a section of gross, as Tollywood gross figures are not officially announced. PK talk 05:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Eega
Hi. I'm Political Cricketer. I noticed your comment in my talk page. Eega share collections are around 57 crores according to TOI. But it includes Tamil collections also. In the article only Telugu collections should be added which are around 42 crores. And coming to gross collections I'm not opposing that Eega's place in the list. But WWgross collections are some what unreliable. That's why I propose to delete it. Eega gross collections are around 125 crores according to some sources. If the column of WWgross is there, then Eega should be there. If the column is removed then Eega will not present in the template. Thank you. PK talk 10:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Kailash29792 (talk) 10:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * To clarify your "doubt", a sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term also refers to a false identity assumed by a member of an Internet community while pretending to be another person. In simpler words, the man who operated the blocked account User:Padmalakshmisx is now operating User:Grosshigh. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:45, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Seerat Kapoor


A tag has been placed on Seerat Kapoor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2015 (UTC)