User talk:Grossmusic

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! - Adolphus79 (talk) 14:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Template:CORRECTED Citation needed nominated for deletion
I have nominated CORRECTED Citation needed for speedy deletion per WP:CSD as substantial duplication of Failed verification. If you support the deletion then you can place db-g7 on the template. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

conflict of interest and block
Hello, Grossmusic. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jimmy Gross, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  18:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  18:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jimmy Gross concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jimmy Gross, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 12:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

From GrossMusic to HasteurBot: I don't know how to respond - why is Wikipedia so hard? See my above info just posted. I find all the techno babble insurmountable.


 * You've just responded, so that's taken care of. Just type your reply under whatever you're replying to and add a ":" in front to indent - as I did with this comment. Then add four tildes at the end ( ~ ), and it'll sign your name and add the date. Thus: UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:30, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The reason you got the notice above is because you created a draft article that hasn't been edited for 180 days. After a certain amount of time (and I apologize, I don't know how long that is), draft articles that haven't been worked on are deleted. The notice was left by an automated process, and that process doesn't check to see if you're blocked or not - so it asked you to edit something that you can't edit. If you like, I can move the draft over to your userspace (where it would be under your name), or you can just let it be deleted if you really don't plan to work on it. Your call.


 * As for the block - We get lots and lots of people coming to Wikipedia with no intent other than to promote their business/scam/whatever. If we see a new editor writing an article, and their username matches the article? 9 times out of 10, they're here to spam and we block. The 10th time is inadvertent, as with your case it seems - clearly, if your name is Gross, having it in your username is logical.


 * That said, have a look at our policy on conflict of interest. Generally, editors are supposed to avoid topic areas where they know or are involved with or employed by the subject. We also have a policy on original research that would preclude your use of personal knowledge to write about your father. I have no doubt that you would write a clear and accurate account, but there is no way to verify that account. In most cases, and most particularly with biographies, we require references from reliable sources independent of the subject. If there are news articles about your father, that might serve as the basis for an article - but one that you probably shouldn't write.


 * There's a lot of information here - take your time and read through our policies, and ask any questions you have. I'll watchlist your page so that I see your replies. Good luck, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:38, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * OK, I think I get it. Thank you for the response & info.


 * As for the "conflict of interest" that was another thing that stopped me from continuing as I recall. I find it an odd policy that family members can't contribute bios, but if that's the case then I don't know what to do. His name does show in other articles & it's a shame there is no entry for him. I was putting together a fact-based non-biased article.


 * Meanwhile, I think I'm still officially blocked somehow. Not sure. I do occasionally make small edits in other articles where I find grammatical &/or factual mistakes. I'm an amateur historian & professional editor by trade.Grossmusic (talk) 21:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * If the article you were working on has proper sources, we can use those sources and come up with something that would work. It's not so much us saying that you can't write about your father because you're not going to be neutral, but rather that generally relatives of the subject don't write in neutral fashion, so let's avoid the whole problem by asking them not to do so at all.


 * Per WP:AGF, I'm going to go ahead and unblock you - on the condition that (for now!) you don't edit any articles about your father. Let me see what sources you've got so far, and I'll try to put together something that would work as an article. Perhaps we can figure something out. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Just wanted to endorse Ultra's assumption of good faith; but also to clarify that "articles about your father" includes articles about bands he was in, etc. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  15:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you & understood.Grossmusic (talk) 16:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Jimmy Gross


Hello Grossmusic. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Jimmy Gross.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:RevWmWestonPattonJr.png
Thanks for uploading File:RevWmWestonPattonJr.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)