User talk:Ground

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

You might find these pages useful:


 * How to edit a page


 * How to write a great article


 * Article naming conventions


 * Wikipedia's Manual of Style

You can always experiment in the sandbox.

One more thing: if you leave a note on any kind of discussion page it's always helpful to sign your post with four tildes ( ~ ), which is automatically converted to your username and the date and time. Don't do this in articles themselves though as they are not 'owned' by any particular contributor.

If you have any questions, see help, leave a question at the help desk, or feel free to drop me a line on my talk page.

Thanks again and happy editing!

&mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 02:21, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Byrd
Sorry, I'm no expert on Byrd, but it seems to me there isn't much of a contradiction, as the act he supported did not deal with the issue of segregation, but rather voting rights. While one could certainly say they are connected, they are not the same. I would suppose that that Byrd was not against blacks voting, as long as he didn't have to sit at the same lunch counter with them. The article seems to say that he only supported the act to reinforce the Democrats in the south, and to prevent a more substantial civil rights bill from being proposed. That's my take on it. I'll post this basic statement on the Byrd talk page. -R. fiend 13:42, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Johnson
Please don't ask questions in articles. If you have a question post it in the appropriate talk page. Looking at your other edits, you should know better. AlistairMcMillan 20:09, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * You're right, I should have put it on the talk page. Ground 22:36, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Message from 68.44.184.172
Edit/update pages more carefully--you replaced the entire Phil Collins article with an inferior P.O.S. article without even realizing it.68.44.184.172 04:13, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I completely forgot about going over the history. The page had a title but no text when I visited it (which should have been a tipoff), so I looked at the talk page, saw an article there, and moved it. It was pretty bad =] Ground 11:00, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * No problem. We all make mistakes.  I interpreted your edits, at first, as potentially intentional vandalism; I thought you would have seen the real vandal's "holla" on the page and realized that something fishy must have been going on.  At any rate, it is good that you decided to move the information from the Talk Page to the Article Page, as it is valuable in its own right.  However, User: Hadel is currently on a mad, unilateral quest to remove the four paragraphs that you had taken from the Talk Page, choosing instead to "revert" the longer Phil Collins article back to its state pre-the "holla" vandal (of course this means that anyone's additions/changes to the article that you reinstated will also be lost to us).  This is unacceptable.  Because I have protested him, he has had my I.P. address banned.  I am so sick of some of the egos that these people have.  We must set up a tribunal here in order to bring these terroristic Wikipedia demagogues to justice!  Their abuse cannot be tolerated if this project is to remain impartial and relevant.172.147.111.208 17:49, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Overzealous Wikification
Hi there. I think it is great that you are working on Wikifying articles that are in need of it; however, some of the links you create are slightly outside of the norm. I wouldn't have noticed except that you edited Dred Scott v. Sanford, which falls within the realm of my Project.

If you could read over Make only links relevant to the context, I think it would be beneficial to everyone. Some of the links you make are good, but some fall outside of the scope of the article. There are definitely a great many different opinions on Wikipedia as to what should be linked and what should not, but if you only link words relevant to context, you will be sure not to over-wikify.

I'm always glad to see some younger members of the community making substantive contributions, but please try to stay within the guidelines set forth in the Manual of style for everyone's benefit.

Thanks, Skyler 17:06, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)

Wikipedia is knowledge. Knowledge is power.

Did you know has been updated
And an article you created recently has made the line up and is now featured on the main page. Enjoy! -- Mgm|(talk)]] 21:10, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the recognition. Ground 21:12, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * It's quite a good article. Thank you for writing it. Warmest regards --Neutralitytalk 03:19, Dec 26, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Wikified
Thanks for the Wikification. James 007 08:04, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Admire
Why thank you! What a nice thing to say, it made my day! :) -- Cheers, Cecropia | explains it all ® 18:29, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Laughing
Thanks for the note on my user page! If I'd known that mumbling was funny, I'd have done it more often. Elf | Talk 21:52, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

table
Wow, people actually read my page? :) Anyway, "Senate" means there's a senate table (and all 50 states have that); S. Passages means I've added footnotes for passages in the senate (deaths, contests, etc). House and H. Passages work the same way, but for the US House of Representatives. Delegates means I've added a table for the delegates from the territory before it became a state. Articles means that there are articles for every senator, rep and delegate for that state. (None have this yet) Alpha means ... damned if I know. :P I guess I should get rid of it. Check simply means verified with an outside source (which none have been, but I have a source lined up). in the chart, X means it's been done, O means it doesn't have to be (i.e. Connecticut has an O for delegates; it was never a territory, therefore no delegates). Hope this helps. :) --Golbez 12:08, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Ahoy?
[lurch]You rang?[/lurch] -- Metahacker 04:34, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject political figures
You signed up for WikiProject Political figures which may restart again after becoming inactive. Are you interested in joining? Also, are you familiar with the page List of former members of the United States Senate? I think that that page has some senators who have articles written about them under other names, moves to be fixed, or articles that need to be written about them. I am working on it, but any help would be appreciated, since you say on your page that you are interested in the Senate. Academic Challenger 02:22, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Suggested Reading re Ollieplatt
Hi, I noticed that you've encountered Ollieplatt and I thought I'd offer a bit of background:

Requests_for_arbitration

Requests_for_arbitration/Libertas/Evidence

Requests_for_arbitration/Libertas/Proposed_decision

Note that Ollieplatt is Libertas and about a dozen other user IDs.

&mdash; Davenbelle 01:11, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)

Removed Links
Why are links to Bohème Magazine considered "Link Spam"?? They link to articles on a free, non-commercial website that individuals researching those topics may be interested in. Visit the links and find out for yourself; they are not spam. They were posed with the genuine idea that Wikipedia users like myself would be interested in those articles. What makes them different from any of the other external links posted? What official body does one have to appeal to in order to get their link posted?

Thanks for your note
It's nice (and somewhat alarming) to know that people actually read the nonsense I put up on my user page. :-) --dablaze  15:54, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for fixing the spelling error on my user page. Taco Deposit | Talk-o to Taco 15:12, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)

Republics
Need your help and/or advice. The British Wikipedian Republican Party sought fit to delete Wikinfo:Classical definition of republic from Wikipedia. There is a terrible brouhaha at Talk:Republic. They won't even allow an external link! SimonP really doesn't know what he is doing. They deleted the Classical definition of republic and created mixed government and politeia instead. The official title of mixed government is a Republic and the Romans translated "politiea" as Republic. And then to top it off the new article Classical republicanism doesn't refer to the Classical republics of Crete, Sparta, Solonic Athens, or Rome but to Machiavelli's ideology. How can that be when Venice in the 13th century instituted a mixed government and called herself a "Republic".

With Jwrosenwieg and Kim Bruning there was a tacit agreement a year ago to have republic be the modern meaning and a [Classical definition of republic] to describe the ancient republics of Hellas and Rome and their influence. To say the least the "Republic section" is all messed up. We need some clarification. I have new information but User:Snowspinner won't let me bring this back up for undelete. (I do grant that a little bit of the Classical definition is original but the rest is not.) I will not let Sparta be called anything but a republic! I will not let the British wikipedian modern republicans strip Sparta, (my heritage and roots) of her rightful name. She is a Classical republic and needs to be called such! At the least, where is the damage in having an external link?WHEELER 15:04, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for fixing the error on my userpage. Can't believe I didn't notice that. &#9999; Oven Fresh ²  03:22, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Core Knowledge curriculum
Hope you like it. :-) I set up the /education page as a convenient place to put notes to myself, but if it's useful to other people, that's good too. Russil Wvong 19:06, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Cheers
Can't believe I didn't check the CAP link :) Thanks for fixing it. Trampled 12:20, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Maurice Greene
Maurice Greene (the american athlete) is not gay. There has never been any mention of Maurice Greene being a homosexual ever. The history says you added the part about him being gay.
 * Isn't he?

Firefox speed
Thanks for the speed tip Brookie 09:13, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image links
Thanks for the tip. It looks like I have to capitalize the file extension to get the links to work. Did you discover the error in an article, or just on my user page? --Smack (talk) 19:45, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sunflowers
Thanks for you kind words about the photos. Really I've just been lucky&mdash;you wouldn't believe the number of bad photos that get taken to get a few good ones :-)   — KayEss | talk 07:36, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Looking for help on a major wiki project
Hey :) I was wondering if you'd be interesting in helping out with www.Knowmore.org, a corporation search wiki we're trying to get off the ground. We could DEFINATELY use some people that know how to make a wiki community great & the site is almost a blank slate at this point.  It's been heavily customized and is designed to help responsible consumers enter any product or company name and immediatly find information about that co. (the main focus of the wiki is corporate & political information in a much more specialized way then wikipedia currently offers) Let me know if you're interested!  aim: knowmoreorg or bernard@knowmore.org

WikiProject Political Figures
You've got your name down on the list of members as being interested here - alas, not a whole lot has been happening. Are you still interested? I'd really like to make an effort at getting this going once and for all. Ambi 13:28, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Norman Borlaug
I've added Norman Borlaug to the FAC page. Consider this a chance for more input, and please be ready to address any issues people have with the page. --brian0918  30 June 2005 04:09 (UTC)

Belated Birthday
Saw you listed at Wikipedians_by_birthday. So, happy belated birthday! Best wishes. :) --User:Jenmoa 05:45, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Fife Symington.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Fife Symington.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

wikipedians
Hello, i saw you were listed on the category:wikipedians by fields of interest under drugs/drug addiction, and i invite you to read this and add your name or something else if you want. cheers! --Ballchef 13:03, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:UserGround2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:UserGround2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 22:18, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Mike Gravel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mike Gravel.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rory096 04:09, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Samuel C. Armstrong
As part of the WikiProject for military history, I have been cleaning up and adding to certain articles on American Civil War generals. In line with other Civil War generals articles, I added a Civil War section and greatly expanded the text for General Armstrong's war service. I also reformatted the references and added footnotes to be compliant with the standard format for ACW bios. Nice work on the postbellum activities - I learned a lot about Armstrong that I did not know! Scott Mingus 19:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
Enjoy the day to the fullest!

Thistheman 05:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:NY AG Eliot Spitzer 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NY AG Eliot Spitzer 1.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Willie McQueen
I recently created a page on this individual, and I just noticed through a Wikimirror that you once had listed a page for him as one of your intended future projects. As such, please take a look at the article and let me know what you think. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 18:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Madison Square Garden
Hi, since you have written on the Madison Square Garden Talk page before, I want to know if you can comment on the current debate on whether a sentence I wrote, about WWE blocking WCW from ever having a show in the garden, belongs in the article. My opinion is that the fact is as important to MSG history as it was to the WWE. Milchama 10:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bella Abzug.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bella Abzug.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  howch e  ng   {chat} 23:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Womens lacrosse1.jpg
Hi Ground, did you have a permission for it's use? Please forward it to permissions@wikimedia.org Thanks in advance, --Flominator 20:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Quentin_Burdick.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Quentin_Burdick.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:George_Hearst.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:George_Hearst.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  howcheng  {chat} 16:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Stuart_Symington.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stuart_Symington.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Mark hatfield.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mark hatfield.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. nadav (talk) 07:00, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

==Fair use rationale for Image:Mario Cuomo C-SPAN.JPG== Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mario Cuomo C-SPAN.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wizardman 21:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Frank Moss.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Frank Moss.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 20:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Steve Brodner
I have an updated biography of Steve Brodner in the works and will keep you posted on it's progress. I'll be using more reliable references than the personal bio at his website. Rezimmerman (talk) 23:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Updated the Steve Brodner page to include reliable references and bibliography.Rezimmerman (talk) 19:35, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Brodner Freedom Fries.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Brodner Freedom Fries.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Gary_Johnson.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gary_Johnson.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 21:56, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:George_Norris.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:George_Norris.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:NY_Sen._James_Buckley.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NY_Sen._James_Buckley.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:34, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Theodore Frelinghuysen.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Theodore Frelinghuysen.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Zoo Fari  18:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Elizabeth Holtzman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Elizabeth Holtzman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 09:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ground1.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Ground1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim 1357  talk  20:07, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

File:UserGround1.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UserGround1.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

File source problem with File:Susan Molinari.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Susan Molinari.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:21, 5 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:21, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Reed Smoot.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Reed Smoot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)