User talk:GroundhogTheater

Welcome...

Hello, GroundhogTheater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help How to write a great article Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there.

WP:CRYSTAL
Noticed you were trying to add that Rex Ryan was hired but per WP:CRYSTAL, we can't add that until someone like ESPN says he has accepted the deal not will accept. Please wait until it happens.-- Iamawesome800  Talk to Me   14:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Route 382
I was very surprised to see an article that I am editing on the AFD list!

The point you bring up is worthy of discussion. What should Wikipedia become? There are many obscure articles in Wikipedia. Over time, a certain standard has been followed regarding what articles are to be kept in Wikipedia and what ones are destroyed (deleted).

Would you like to re-formulate or define the criteria more specifically? I am willing to work with you to develop standards. As you can see, Wikipedia articles include Equitrac, Electronic Distributed Monitoring and Evaluation Solution, Hard turning, Argyrocupha, Frostenden, etc. Chergles (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I looked at your nomination for about ten seconds and I SEE TEXT IN ALL CAPS LIKE YOU ARE SHOUTING and WP:PRETTY and stuff like that. That the way to treat someone's FAC which you are sending to AFD? --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Just defending my buddy. YOU made it personal! -- Burp The Baby   (Talk)  23:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Giving the required notification that you have been reported to WP:WQA. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Ground. While you may have a dispute with others, I don't have a personality dispute with you. Should we discuss what we want Wikipedia to be? My guess is that you think the NY 382 article is too obscure. I hear what you appear to be saying. Should we try to change Wikipedia? I'm willing to consider it. Currently, Wikipedia is a popular encyclopedia and a social site, not an exclusively scholarly encyclopedia. Should we make it so? Chergles (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

SPI case
See the results posted at Sockpuppet investigations/GroundhogTheater. I'm posting this to the talk pages of all 5 accounts. You can communicate with me by email if you like.  — Rlevse • Talk  • 22:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)