User talk:Groupe.canam

I noted the "hangon" tag you applied to the Canam Group article, now deleted, and the assertions you made on its associated talk page. I can't say what might be happening on the French Wikipedia (not that comparisons between articles are considered very useful here, see this policy for details), but all articles in every linguistic version require reliable sources that demonstrate notability in a verifiable way. That would be, essentially, arm's-length third-party expert sources writing in reputable publications that state that the company in question is somehow unusual, special, better than its peers, etc. I found no reason to believe that the company has any notability in the article and thus I decided to agree with the editor who tagged it for speedy deletion. If you would like the deleted material restored to a "sandbox" page where you can add such citations if they can be found, feel free to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste: talk 16:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I note from your username that it is likely that you are in a conflict of interest situation with respect to this particular company. Please have a look through the conflict of interest policy linked in this paragraph for some helpful hints on how you might usefully proceed.  Accounting4Taste: talk 16:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)