User talk:Grudzio240/Archives/2022/January

Welcome!
Hi Grudzio240! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Gleeanon409 (talk) 18:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Andrzej Duda
Hi, you removed my edit and left the following message: In these places, we are describing the opinions of the people/entities mentioned in the text of the article, not any "binding decisions" or "establishing something unconstitutional" only or until their opinions.The added "allegedly" was unnecessary. Now, why I think adding "allegedly" is not only important, but also necessary is because of the system of law in Poland. We are used with the democratic constitutional rule of law, but it is not an universal thing around the world. Around the world, the duty of judicial review of constitutionality doesn't always belong to a constitutional court (for example, in North Korea this role is attributed to Standing Committee of the Supreme People's Assembly). So in the case of Andrzej Duda's acts, neither a Minister of Justice nor the former president Constitutional Tribunal nor National Council of the Judiciary of Poland have the legal competence to state anything as unconstitutional. This competence belongs to the Constitutional Tribunal of Poland exclusively. By excluding "allegedly" the interpretation given to the information is that such authorities can state what's constitutional or not in Poland, which is completely wrong. We have to add allegedly to mark that the statement over those acts of President Duda are merely opinions. And I have to repeat that the fact that it is an opinion isn't self evident since the authorities that are responsible with judicial review of constitutionality aren't the same everywhere. --Kotys ek Beos (talk) 13:53, 25 November 2021 (UTC)