User talk:Grumpyyoungman01

List of ancient civilisations listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of ancient civilisations. Since you had some involvement with the List of ancient civilisations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rebutt
Hello Grumpyyoungman01,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rebutt for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Lithopsian (talk) 18:38, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Windows media player classic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Windows media player classic. Since you had some involvement with the Windows media player classic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:12, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Incorporations based in Australia has been nominated for discussion
Category:Incorporations based in Australia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Excluded middle.png


The file File:Excluded middle.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Argument maps


A tag has been placed on Category:Argument maps indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:51, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Main contention


The article Main contention has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Wikipedia is not a dictionary - searches on 'main contention' in google scholar and JSTOR return results for the colloquial sense of the term, there is no indication that this is a notable concept or term in philosophical logic."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &#32;- car chasm (talk) 01:22, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Grouping has been nominated for deletion
Category:Grouping has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

"Elements of a yarn" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elements_of_a_yarn&redirect=no Elements of a yarn] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

"Elements of a story" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elements_of_a_story&redirect=no Elements of a story] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Principle of abstraction for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Principle of abstraction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Principle of abstraction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Daask (talk) 17:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)