User talk:GrunterVonHaart207$!

Welcome
Hello, GrunterVonHaart207$!, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place " " on this page and someone will drop by to help. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·cont) Join WER 01:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

November 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Demographics of atheism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Demographics of atheism was changed by GrunterVonHaart207$! (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916865 on 2013-11-03T12:51:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:51, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Misrepresentation of sources
Please note that I have reverted your edits to Demographics of atheism. Not only had you removed substantial sourced content, but you had blatantly misrepresented the source you cited. Such behaviour is liable to result in you being blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Demographics of atheism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 14:03, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Ulla Lindström
You are also at WP:3RR at this article also. This is a courtesy warning only as I've already warned you for another article. Please stop and use talk pages to discuss your proposed edits. Dougweller (talk) 14:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism warning
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Importance of religion by country, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Demographics of atheism. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Rhododendrites (talk) 14:53, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Rhododendrites (talk) 14:55, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 14:57, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kuru  (talk)  14:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 15:00, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of World War II flying aces. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of World War II flying aces was changed by GrunterVonHaart207$! (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920437 on 2013-11-04T17:53:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Grunter Von Haart and other nonsense
Please be aware that Wikipedia is not a platform for the promotion of idiotic hoaxes about fictitious female WW2 Luftwaffe aces. If you post further nonsense like you did at List of World War II flying aces, I will be calling for you to be permanently banned from Wikipedia - and I suspect that this will be a formality. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:31, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)