User talk:Gryllida/Archives/2010

File source problem with File:RobertRauschenberg.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RobertRauschenberg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:RobertRauschenberg.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RobertRauschenberg.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:PassWord Strength.png
Thank you for uploading File:PassWord Strength.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Fixed. Gryllida 00:24, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Explanation, please
Hi. I assume there is an explanation for this edit? Regards, Mattinbgn (talk) 02:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * OOps. Wrong button. Sorry Gryllida 02:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, happens to the best of us! Cheers, Mattinbgn (talk) 02:55, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Reviewing
Congrats on getting the rollbacker and reviewer flags! You should vote on WP:PC/S. — Waterfox ( talk ) 13:33, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, Waterfox! I've voted there. Gryllida 14:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

It is a false positive. And again. I've reported it. Thanks. Gryllida 01:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

It's false positive. My signature does contain a link to contributions page. I've added NoAutosign to this page. Gryllida 00:41, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Or, rather, changed signature. %  Gryllida  04:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Archiving bot, you fail. I'm archiving manually this time. %  Gryllida talk 14:29, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Chemical structures
Simple compounds have complicated structures, so please ask around before attempting or guessing, although your intentions are admirable. --Smokefoot (talk) 22:55, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Is the Wikimedia Commons image File:Lithiumulfide.png invalid? %  Gryllida talk 23:19, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably something that we flushed long ago. As you know, Wikipedia is good about creating content, but retiscent to remove it.  I dont understand the process, but most of the good structures are posted in the correct articles and there is nothing left that is decent. Now if you look in other language wikis, then there is a ton of good stuff.--Smokefoot (talk) 23:27, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Ok, it's incomplete and doesn't contain the three-dimensional structure. Thanks. %  Gryllida talk 23:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

✅. Voted to keep the tool switched on while improvements are worked on. %  Gryllida talk 02:55, 21 September 2010 (UTC)