User talk:Gs120

Recent edit to Redd Foxx
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Spolglans (talk) 18:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Your recent editing history at Sean Hepburn Ferrer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GiantSnowman 19:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Stop edit warring
You seem to be engaged in an edit war at Sean Hepburn Ferrer Please stop that. Instead of repeatedly trying to force your preferred version of the article, use the article talk page to discuss the matter with other editors. After a consensus has developed, THEN make your edits to the article, but not before. If you don't stop edit warring in the article, you may be blocked. -- Jayron 32 19:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. GiantSnowman 19:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Sean Hepburn Ferrer. Bbb23 (talk) 21:08, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, Gs120. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Sean Hepburn Ferrer, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 12:51, 8 May 2019 (UTC)