User talk:Gsinghonline

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) Hello, Gsinghonline, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Be Bold!
 * Learn from others
 * Be kind to others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us a bit about yourself
 * Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Reconsider !  07:33, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Candidate advertising
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Would you terribly mind my asking what the timing of the elections has to do with the creation of the article? - Vianello (Talk) 04:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Not at all Vianello - it just makes the availability of that information more beneficial to constituents and potential voters. Ideally, the article would have been published much earlier. The history and track record of each candidate is information that should be in the public domain. Having said that, the election itself is not the main reason for its creation. The main point is that Gurcharan Singh is a noteworthy individual of interest. I'd be gratefull if you shared your thoughts. GSinghOnline (Talk) 09:13, 20 April 2010 (GMT)
 * Phew. This is a tough spot for me, I have to confess. With the "we" as well as your username choice, I assume you probably represent a group which is in some manner connected to this candidate. Wikipedia accounts are expressly for individuals, not collectives, and it does betray a strong conflict of interest. But you've been very reasonable, and COI aside, if you honestly can offer objective, completely neutral information, then that's good information, regardless of who put it forward. I'm going to think on this a little bit. Hopefully someone else will see your unblock request and chime in with a second opinion. I may go "beat the bushes" for other input if not. - Vianello (Talk) 17:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Trying to promote or not, your username is still not appropriate. Change your username if you want to edit here.--Martha&#39;s Gold Rush (talk) 00:12, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Guidance Statement: I would be willing to unblock if, and only if: If you agree to the above, please file a username change unblock request, which will be followed by a trip to WP:UNC ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 09:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * account becomes renamed at WP:UNC - a username change unblock request would be needed
 * only one person ever uses the account
 * no further attempts are made to introduce this or similar articles again
 * no attempts are made to introduce information related to the person to other articles, except when the article already exists and is directly related to this individual
 * links to any website, blog, etc that is owned/used/maintained by or for this individual are not introduced to any Wikipedia article

Proposed deletion of File:Gurcharan Singh 1.jpg


The file File:Gurcharan Singh 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused. No permission."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 07:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)