User talk:Gsoler/cc

Summary
Ok, I've tried to publish this article, but it was speedily deleted. The main challenge is notablity.

The thing here is finding secondary sources -and that's a problem. Crimson Circle don't seem to be on the frontpages around the world. So if we can't find magazines and so one writing about CC, we'll might give this article up for now. Check also my frustrated dialogs after beeing deleted:     (Maybe not a very enlightened energy from me, but at least honest..).

To do

 * Basing the article more on secondary sources (See:reliable sources, Citing sources and Notability (web))
 * Improve language
 * More information

New around here?
Are you new around here? Then maybe this pages is helpful to you:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Introduction
Nice improvements in the introduction section..

It's also important to have a viewpoint of a person not familiar with the subject -and choose words accordingly. Terms like "New Energy", "Shouds" and "group energy" is hard to use when making an article for those not familiar with Crimson Circle. But it's possible if we describe what we mean by those words later in the article.. Geir 11:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)