User talk:Gsueso2

Welcome!
Hi Gsueso2! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tamil language, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Alert
Note especially the 30/500 rule: editors who have been registerd less than 30 days, or have less than 500 edits should not edit in IP (=Israel/Palestine) area, cheers, Huldra (talk) 23:24, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canaanite. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

I Am that I Am
Hello Gsueso2. Just wanted to let you know that i reverted your change to I Am that I Am and why: You changed Jehovah to YHWH in the See also section, but unfortunately i see a couple of things wrong there ~ the list was no longer alphabetical (very minor and easy to fix) and, more to the point, YHWH was already wlinked, so there was no need to duplicate it (Tetragrammaton is the target of YHWH, and it's already there) whereas you removed Jehovah which was a useful wlink. If i can help, or you have any questions, please ask ~ i'll be watching this page for a while. Happy days, LindsayHello 17:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neoteny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Lead sections and sourcing
Hi - the lead section of an article is intended to act as a summary of the rest of the article. A iodine, you added an assertion to the lead, which I couldn't find anywhere in the body of the article. I've removed it - if you can identify a source to support the content you added, please consider adding it to an appropriate section rather than to the lead. Thanks Girth Summit  (blether)  14:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello
Thank you very much for your edits in this artice, not many people are interested in these esoteric subjects, In Tamil loanwords in Biblical Hebrew, you wrote for bûts/בּוּץ - ''Possibly related to Tamil, via South Arabian also possibly via Sanskrit. Already attested in Syrian and Akkadian inscriptions dating back to the 9th century BCE. of which Possibly related to Tamil, via South Arabian'' is cited in Chaim Rabin's article, the rest look very plausible but what would be a good citation for that ? Thanks Kanatonian (talk) 15:58, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, everything there is written in the Rabin article page 436

--Gsueso2 (talk) 23:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Alert II
You were served an alert 10 August 2021, and I wrote "Note especially the 30/500 rule: editors who have been registerd less than 30 days, or have less than 500 edits should not edit in IP (=Israel/Palestine) area".

Still you continue, adding Hebrew first to an Islamic time gate in Jerusalem, or removing "Palestinian" from Mujir al-Din (link).

For the last time; please stop. If you don't, then expect to see youself reported to WP:AE -- Huldra (talk) 22:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello,

Regarding Mujir al-Din, even the Palestinians article traces back the origins of the identity to the 17th century at the earliest. There was definitely no concept of a Palestinian people as distinct from other Arabs of Syria in the 15th century when Mujir al-Din lived, similar to how "Jerusalemite" is not an ethnic identifier. That is, unless you have a source for Mujir al-Din showing an affinity to a Palestinian national identity. It would be more reasonable to keep Palestinian as a geographic identifier and link to Palestine (region) or Ottoman Palestine.

Regarding the "Islamic time gate", the article itself states "the present gate was probably built in the 520s AD, as part of Justinian I's building program in Jerusalem" and goes as far back as the Second Temple period in its history section. But reading around on the web a bit it does look like the Jewish traditions surrounding the modern gate arose only in the Islamic period. Regardless of that, you ought to remove "Shushan gate" as the Hebrew name for the gate which is unsourced BS added by an IP. The name is שער הרחמים, Sha'ar HaRachamim, the Gate of Mercy as stated later in the article. It is only reasonable to add the Hebrew name in the infobox as well, first or second, considering its significance in Judaism. Besides that, the precise transliteration of the Arabic name is "Al-Dhahabi" (well, actually Adh-Dhahabi) and a Turkish Islamic institute is not a reliable source for an "Al-Zahabi" pronunciation.

--Gsueso2 (talk) 23:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Alcheringa
Please note that disambiguation pages like : are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:


 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
 * Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 17:25, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mayotte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Citronella.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judaism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judah.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

1RR
24 edits in to being extended-confirmed and violating the 1RR at a high-traffic article like Israeli settlement is certainly bold, but kindly self-revert your violation or it may be reported to arbitration enforcement. To be clear, youve reverted this twice in 24 hours.  nableezy  - 21:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Apologies, I did not realize that the first edit would count as a revert. --Gsueso2 (talk) 21:33, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Ive made an edit on the talk page to discuss the edit.  nableezy  - 21:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Book of Genesis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mathsci (talk) 02:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Wadi Qana
You have just made two reverts at this article,-which is governed by Arbpia3 rules of 1R,- aside from conducting original research to contradict a statement in Benvenisti,son of a master geographer raised from the cradle with such studies. So self-revert or you will be reported. Nishidani (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * An original document of the naming committee stating the name Qana was kept is not original research, and pointing out that Benevenisti's "Wadi al-Qana" is very unlikely to be referring to this Wadi Qana is hardly "contradicting a master geographer". Anyhow, I forget that deleting existing content counts as a revert. Reverted for now, see talk page. --Gsueso2 (talk) 20:56, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes, thats a straightforward 1RR violation. You should self-revert or you may be reported to arbitration enforcement.  nableezy  - 20:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * "Reverted for now"
 * I don't think by that that you understand how wiki works. It doesn't work by the gaming the indulgence of editors who, rather than report you, advise you to revert, with an undertaking that you will restore the text, and exercise the option of re-reverting back to you favoured excision after 24 hours. Since your edit is contested, you will have to address the talk page there and convince editors of the relevance of your WP:OR.Nishidani (talk) 21:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)