User talk:Gsx1/Identity Politics/Bibliography

Overall, I think the article is really well-written. I really love how comprehensive, yet understandable, the critiques and criticisms of identity politics and the intersectional critiques sections are. But there is no verification of any of the statements in these sections or any others, except for Asian-American Identity Politics. I’m not sure if these are sections you plan on editing/expanding, but I can see on the published article page that these other sections have sources. One aspect that can definitely be improved is expanding the array groups in the racial and ethnocultural section. A section on Latinx/Hispanic identity politics needs to be included. There should also be expansion of the Muslim identity politics and Maori identity politics because they are very short in comparison to the other groups in this section. It also might be interesting to add in Native American identity politics as they are also an underrepresented group. In terms of completeness, I think the article is pretty well-developed, but more underrepresented groups need to be covered and there needs to be more sources cited (if these are the sections you plan on editing). Devikajhaveri (talk) 17:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)