User talk:Gtace Goodwin

Doris Day Further Reading
Hi, I noticed that you and another editor seem to be in a disagreement over the inclusion of a book in the further reading section of the Doris Day article. I've started a section on that article's talk page, here, where we can discuss whether to include that book or not, and hopefully resolve this disagreement. I'd appreciate it if until we work this out, you refrain from removing or adding the book to the article. Thanks, Prodego  talk  00:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Doris Day. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Also, editorial comments are not accepted practice on Wikipedia.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  04:58, 2 January 2011 (UTC)