User talk:Gtagg

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Gtagg. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! France 3470  ( talk ) 13:24, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much, France 3470  ! Gtagg 22:08, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Major John Buchanan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 17:06, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Orphaned non-free media (File:D. Canale Modern Storefront.jpeg)
Thanks for uploading File:D. Canale Modern Storefront.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 09:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Robert Gallo
Hello, Gtagg, and thank you for your recent edits to Robert Gallo. I have several concerns which I have attempted to articulate at the talk page. Please join in discussion there to achieve consensus prior to reintroduction of these edits, per bold, revert, discuss. I have also posted to the BLP noticeboard albeit without mentioning you by name. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 18:09, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey Keepcalmandcarryon, I will draft a response to your concerns as soon as I am able. The overriding issue with the version of Robert Gallo's wikipage prior to my edits is that it is quite one-sided in favor of Dr. Gallo, placing the majority of events in a positive light for Dr. Gallo when in fact he was found guilty of scientific misconduct (later vacated on appeal) for co-opting the French Pasteur Lab's LAV sample into his own, which led to him claiming credit for the discovery of HIV and later the HIV test, both of which were based on the French LAV sample. Notwithstanding HHS vacating the misconduct determination due to a change in the definition and application, this was proven in later years when the French successfully obtained additional royalties from the HIV test following two genetic determinations (Pasteur and NIH) that found Gallo's HLTV-3B to be identical to the French LAV. Futhermore, the NIH analysis cast doubt to the claim that this was a result of contamination because it openly questioned whether Gallo's HLTV-3B ever existed. As a result, the wikipage should document his unquestionable "controversial" role in the identification of HIV and the subsequent HIV test. The wikipage, as it stands now without my edits, does not even mention that he was found guilty of scientific misconduct (only says "cleared of all wrongdoing"), he misappropriated the French LAV sample for both the initial HIV discovery and the later HIV test, or his other tactics that were documented in the HHS rebuke of his methods during this period. --Gtagg 21:03, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dr. Alvin J. Ingram


Hello, Gtagg. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Dr. Alvin J. Ingram".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, 1989. I am still editing the page and hope to go live soon. Please let me know if I need to do anything more to preserve the page as I continue to revise it.