User talk:Guapoaaron/Two-step flow of communication/Icedcoffee14 Peer Review

Hi! I am a student at the University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg and I am supposed to peer review this article. When I first read about the Two-step flow of communication, I thought that it was helpful to see the picture of how it works. I think that this will also help other readers understand how it works as well. I also thought the information of how it was founded and who the founding fathers were was also very descriptive and it added to my understanding of what the Two-step flow is. Something that I didn't see in this article was any current research or examples of how this is portrayed in our world. I think that these are both important aspects because it seems that Two-step flow is relevant in today's media and I think that by adding current research, it will help readers understand how it takes effect. Also, I think examples from the past can also be helpful because it will show readers how Two-step flow has evolved over time.Another thing that I thought could be changed is the section of where published works are. I think that it would be more helpful if there were published works that included academic journals and peer reviewed articles instead of magazines that could be known to be biased. I think that by adding academic journals, it will help make this Wikipedia page more credible.