User talk:GuarénDeBiblioteca

April 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Labor Party. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Dwpaul  Talk   01:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Spanish general election, 2011 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Spanish general election, 2011 was changed by GuarénDeBiblioteca (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912508 on 2015-05-24T19:48:45+00:00.

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social Democratic Party of Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Democratic Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

EU elections 2014 UK
Your recent editing history at European Parliament election, 2014 (United Kingdom) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.If you feel for whatever reason that there is a more appropriate image of Nigel Farage for this article, then please make the suggestion on the talk page and give your reasons why. We will then need to establish consensus among other editors for any change of image. We can not simply have anyone changing photographs or formatting just because they prefer that image or format, we need to consistent with Wikipedia policies and with other articles on wikipedia. An election info box is meant to have a formal image of the party leader, I do not see how the image you have presented is formal as Mr Farage appears to be grinning. 2.98.38.127 (talk) 23:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leader of the Labour Party (UK), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Michelle Bachelet
I suggest you to stop your editions on Michelle Bachelet by the fact that it's a cropped image, not a high quality photo like the other one, which it's also more similar to the official portrait. I would like that you could give me a more ellaborate reason rather than simply saying "bad quality". I'm waiting for that. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 23:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Assembly (France), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Jacob. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

STOP
Can you stop doing such heavy and arbitrary changes in Spanish election articles without even discussing anything about it or even giving any reason or argument to back it up? Your edits are not supported, and have been reverted in multiple times, sometimes by several users. Stop doing it. Impru20 (talk) 09:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC) Not only on Spanish election articles, but also on UK and French election articles from what I'm seeing. Again, giving no reason to do so. Reverting your edits. Next time I should raise an issue on you for disruptive editing. You can't just come here and entirely change election articles as you like without giving any valid reasons to do so and breaking settled consensus and customary practice on election article-making just because you feel like it. Impru20 (talk) 09:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Spanish general election, 1977, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Spanish general election, 2011, you may be blocked from editing.

I will also be contacting administrators, because your account seems to have the sole purpose of disruptive editing. Mechordeus (talk) 17:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social Democrat Radical Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Transport and Communications. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leader of the Liberal Democrats, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Party for Democracy/meta/shortname


A tag has been placed on Template:Party for Democracy/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PanchoS (talk) 02:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

United Kingdom general election, 2015
You know there is an ongoing RfC about the infobox on United Kingdom general election, 2015, so why do you keep pushing edits on the article? Let the RfC come to a conclusion; please do not WP:EDITWAR. Wikipedia policy is very clear here: there's no deadline, let the discussion come to a conclusion. Bondegezou (talk) 09:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)