User talk:Guasti

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! nymets2000 ( t / c / l ) 14:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

File:GRRRR.jpg
I have tagged File:GRRRR.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 17:27, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Xbox 360 games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Crystal and Emerald
There is no reason to delink these redirects whatsoever. Just because they do not have articles now does not mean they will never not have articles again, and it certainly helps to point people to the proper locations of the content when they exist as redirects.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 14:48, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=625587400 your edit] to List of largest cities in Brazil may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:35, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * capitals are also the largest city in their respective state, exceptions being Florianópolis which is the capital and the second largest city of Santa Catarina state, and [[Vitória,
 * city of Espírito Santo) state; there are also non-capital metropolitan areas in São Paulo Campinas, Santos, Paraíba Valley, Minas Gerais (Vale do Aço), [[

Disambiguation link notification for October 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of largest cities in Brazil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boa Vista. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

2015 Sociedade Esportiva Palmeiras season
Hi,

I must insist that you stops to make this "Reserve squad" edits. As i say, there is no "Reserve squad". The squad is not split by competitions. An example, Cleiton Xavier didn't sign to the "Reserve squad". Guilherme (talk) 23:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, there is no Reserve Squad. No, there is a Reserve Squad. Let me explain that.


 * What is the point to put names in the list, that can not play for the team? As long as the first stage of the competition is being played (later four substitutions are grant), they are not allowed to play! Later, when it ends I'll merge it again - if the premier competition also has a limit number of registered players. Then I'll get the information and divide again.


 * For other visitors of the site, wikipedians, and fans of the team, this way is much easier to follow as the others are simply ineligible.


 * As for the templates at the bottom, here's the thing: a lot of articles about football clubs' seasons has this pattern. And it is quite simple. For Palmeiras the templates are the exactly the same for all the seasons, and it's important to keep it clean. Putting unnecessary competitions templates' are not clever because it have no connection with the URL of the article! At all. There is no need of that.


 * I truly hope you understand this, cheers. Gabriel (talk) 01:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Simply ineligible? For the "fans" or the "visitors", as a "Reserve squad" information, what they gonna think? they will think that these players are of a "reserve" or a "B" team, which don't exists. And here you are the man of the "patterns", just you take a look at the other teams seasons, This division doesn't exist. Guilherme (talk) 00:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  05:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

HRE
Hello, I reverted your change to the HRE lead because this issue was discussed at length here. There is disagreement in the sources over which date the HRE begins, so we chose to discuss both and not state one as definitive. Before the current lead was drafted, there were frequent re-wordings around the 800/962 issue, while this version has been stable for over two years. Please do not change the text without discussing first. Thanks, Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 16:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * That's alright. But then again, that particularly article needs a bit more clearness. Maybe putting a note after the year in the box...? For example: 800/962[a] with [a] standing for "800 as East Francia, 962 as Holy Roman Empire". Maybe in this way is better for the reader to take this in mind, that the formation of the HRE is a bit blurry and the reader will take note to this controversy.


 * Other controversy in my point of view surrounds the article Kingdom of France. If you take a look, it states 843 as the year of the foundation of the Kingdom. It's commonly known that 843 is the year of the formation of West Francia; the primarily stage of the Kingdom. Maybe again, changing to 843/987 with (or without) a note to explain? It is just ideas in order to follow a pattern or something. Cheers, Gabriel (talk) 16:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm not so concerned about the infobox, since the lead deals with the distinction clearly. Looks like the KoF lead does as well. The infobox is just a summary, so detail is necessarily left out. I wouldn't be opposed to a note to clarify, though. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I made a few changes in the infobox of the article. I hope the note written can explain well enough this doubt. Gabriel (talk) 18:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 06:10, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Marshadow
Hi. The Pokémon Marshadow has not been officially announced to exist, and the Pokémon articles on Wikipedia have always been restricted to listing officially revealed Pokémon only. This goes for both prerelease leaks and unannounced mythical Pokémon; as an example, the Pokémon Volcanion was not listed as an actual Pokémon prior to its reveal in late 2015, despite hackers having uncovered it in late 2013. Marshadow should not be added to the list until actual, trustworthy sources report its existence. Thanks for reading :) 85.167.27.57 (talk) 19:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Your recent editing history at List of Pokémon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You have been told multiple times that Marshadow has not been officially revealed. Please wait until it's official before it's added.''  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:02, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!