User talk:Gucciboyau

Since you're the original editor of the Luella Bartley article and you blanked it, do you want to have it deleted? If so, tell me; I found it during a check. In such a thing happens to you again, you should request a speedy deletion (write db-author at the top of the page). If an article was created and edited by only one user, s/he can ask for its deletion. Blanking it doesn't work. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 12:00, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

speedydel
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Phoebe Philo, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.vogue.co.uk/whos_who/Phoebe_Philo/default.html. As a copyright violation, Phoebe Philo appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Phoebe Philo has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Phoebe Philo. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Phoebe Philo, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --Gurubrahma 12:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --NaconKantari 22:54, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Samantha Fox discography
Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Prodego talk  22:54, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Margaux.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Margaux.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:09, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Phoebe_Philo_image.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Phoebe_Philo_image.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kate Bush - Aerial.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Kate Bush - Aerial.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kate Bush - Aerial.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kate Bush - Aerial.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)