User talk:Guest473

April 2015
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Renee Young because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 02:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Renee Young. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Renee Young was changed by Guest473 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907575 on 2015-04-26T02:49:07+00:00.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Renee Young. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If Young has ended that relationship, you need to provide a reliable source that it's over—and it's probably relevant, at least for the time being, to keep the mention of it in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 02:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)