User talk:GuestyKnowsBetter24

September 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DannyS712 (talk) 01:35, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Cardiff-Newport metropolitan area
I have reverted your additions of Cardiff-Newport metropolitan area to the articles of several towns, because the area does not appear to have any official status or be a widely-used term. Also, I have proposed the merger of the Cardiff-Newport metropolitan area article into South East Wales, please add any comments on the merger at Talk:South East Wales. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Stamford, Lincolnshire
Thanks for contributing to the article Stamford, Lincolnshire. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 20:40, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cheshire East. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Dr Greg  talk 00:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Final warning
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 15:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't know why you decided to start changing the lead sections of our articles about multiple towns in England to call them suburbs of other cities, but you were doing so without any sourcing to support your decision, and you were not following the content of the body of the articles - hence the block. I am not sure whether you were intentionally vandalising the articles, or whether you are simply unsure about how things work here, so I am giving you the benefit of the doubt and making this a short time-limited block, but if this sort of thing resumes when the block expires, you should expect the next one to be indefinite. To be clear: our leads follow the sourced content of the body of the article. If you want to change them to say that a town is really a suburb of another town, you need reliable sourcing to demonstrate that, and you need to make the change with sourcing to the body of the article before changing the lead. And frankly, you should probably propose a change like that on the article's talk page rather than just boldly making the change at multiple articles in quick succession. Girth Summit  (blether)  15:17, 27 September 2022 (UTC)