User talk:Gui2u

Neoconservatism
Hi, and welcome. I added some comments on the talk page at Neoconservatism (United States). I would recommend checking out the neutral point of view article to help you figure out how to edit with as little friction as possible, especially if your interest is in political topics. The arguments can get kind of rough. Also Be Bold is a good one to read, and supports your "change without discussion." User:Thames is within bounds to ask for a justification of your change, and that's what the Talk pages are for, when there's disagreement about a point like that. Anyway, enjoy. Kaisershatner 21:15, 18 November 2005 (UTC)


 * You might find WP:REVERT helpful as an explanation of how to restore changes that were destroyed by vandalism or by someone else's changes (like on the talk page at neoconservatism). However, in wiki-etiquette, reverting is at least mildly inflammatory, so be circumspect.  Another page that pertains to the argument you're having at Neoconservatism is Cite sources.  If User:Thames wants to assert something like "many neoconservatives still support traditionally Democratic views on certain issues," which may or may not be true, he certainly should support that assertion with a factual reference.  (I doubt one exists, but perhaps there are quotations of Wolfowitz et al. revealing their social policy views that could corroborate that opinion).  Either way, you're on safe ground to ask for supporting evidence for assertions of that kind.   Cheers,  Kaisershatner 19:00, 19 November 2005 (UTC)