User talk:Guide99

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  08:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.cifiaonline.com/shaikhasedullahquadri.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cifiaonline.com/shaikhasedullahquadri.htm. As a copyright violation, Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri


A tag has been placed on Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Guide99


A tag has been placed on User:Guide99, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of User:Guide99 and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:17, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
VernoWhitney (talk) 14:41, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri
A tag has been placed on Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Guide99. Thanks for your submission at Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri - I notice you contest the deletion of the page, but removed the speedy deletion tag at the same time.  Because you created the page, you must not remove the original tags at the same time as you place the  .  I've had to put the original tag back, but as you've contested deletion, it will be down to an administrator to decide what happens.  Sorry for the inconvenience, and I hope you understand.  Barking Fish  Talk to me &#124; My contributions 10:54, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri
A tag has been placed on Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Chzz  ► 08:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

re Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri
It's not enough for the copyright holder to release his material just for use on Wikipedia. Instead, he must release the material for the entire world to use. We do not use material that retains its copyright, because we allow anyone else to re-use our material for any purpose.

You can release the material by entering it into the public domain, or by releasing it under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA), which amounts to basically the same thing. If you do this, anyone may use the material for any reason, including attacks on Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri.

Are you sure you want to do this?

If for some odd reason you do, see Donating copyrighted materials for more details. Basically, the usual way to do this is to add the following message to your web site:


 * The text of this website is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

I strongly suggest that, instead, you rewrite the article in your own words. Herostratus (talk) 13:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

'''Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri has written to Wikipedia the following letter today again.

To:permissions-en@wikimedia (dot) org Date 28.6.2010

Dear Gentlemen:

I, Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri have authorized 'Habib", (User ID Guide99 Wikipedia) and to Wikipedia to use the contents at page http://www.correctislamicfaith.com/abouttheshaikh.htm.

This is my third letter to Wikipedia. I don't know what is going on in Wikipedia. There does not seem to be an organized system in your organization. Mr. Habib complaints that his page is deleted in spite of written permissions.

SHAIKH MIR ASEDULLAH QUADRI OWNER www.correctislamicfaith.com www.cifiaonline.com ''' --

Since the Shaikh has permitted to use the entire page in free domain, I hope Wikipedia will publish my page as soon as possible.

Guide99 (talk) 19:20, 27 June 2010 (UTC) --

Copyright problem: Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.correctislamicfaith.com/abouttheshaikh.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! T RANSPORTER M AN  (TALK ) 13:43, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Update regarding copyright concern
Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out above and sufficient time has passed since the placement of the notice, the article has been deleted for copyright concerns. This deletion is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) and GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (if you are not the copyright holder or have co-authored the material, release under CC-BY-SA-compatible license alone is sufficient), the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Wikimedia Communications committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you still may (or resend it, if you believe your original may have been lost), and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.

As Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that our licenses permit modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained and future copies are compatibly licensed.

Please note that once permission is verified, the material may be evaluated and altered to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Although we appreciate donations, we cannot guarantee that material donated will be retained.

Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Naik as Salafi
Hi. If you want a source that says that Zakir Naik is a Salafi, see this:. I have no idea how reliable the CIFIA is, however. Regards, Jeff5102 (talk) 10:38, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello Guide99, I respectfully agree with Jeff5102. There is nothing wrong with stating that Zakir Naik is a Salafi if he is a Salafi, but there is something incorrect in making a statement about a person's faith without a reliable source. If you think the source mentioned by Jeff5102 is reliable (I'm unsure myself), why not add it?GorgeCustersSabre (talk) 17:35, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Please add any reliable and reasonable source if you think it is objective evidence that Zakir Naik is a Salafi. I have no axe to grind. I am not for Salafis and I am not against Salafis. I am not for Naik and I am not against him. YOU need to provide evidence. I don't need to because this is not my assertion. It is yours. Telling me what a Salafi is does not constitute evidence that Naik is a Salafi. Wikipedia is not supposed to be based on new research, or personal judgements, but evidence. Thank you.GorgeCustersSabre (talk) 11:41, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

= Genuine Dispute = There is a genuine dispute of edit on Dr. Zakir Naik's page. I explained above that it is in the best interest of (Wikipedia, Dr. Naik, and truthfulness of information) and neutrality that the edit is not reverted. I thought I was protecting the image of Wikipedia.

I would appreciate to be explained, answered properly and convinced, rather than silenced menacingly.

I have not "silenced" you, let alone with menance. See my comments above. But it is incumbent on you to provide reliable EVIDENCE. That's all. I wish you happiness and peace.GorgeCustersSabre (talk) 11:43, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:11, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Neutral, 3rd party references needed for Mir Asedullah Quadri or it will be deleted
Greetings, I note your article Mir Asedullah Quadri has been deleted numerous times before, and it will happen yet again unless you provide neutral, 3rd party references proving his notability. This is especially important as he appears to be a living person, and per WP:BLP biographies of living people positively have to be footnoted. Footnotes to blogs, sectarian websites, or personal websites do not cout. What you need are footnotes to a news article from a reputable newspaper or book that is not necessarily a direct supporter of any religious/political movement associated with Quadri. We maintain these standards so that we get the objective story, rather than just the info that a partisan site or personal website wants to promote. Hope that's good enough to get you started; the article will go up for deletion yet again if such footnotes aren't added. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mir Asedullah Quadri


The article Mir Asedullah Quadri has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. --DAJF (talk) 06:17, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

It is not good to vandalize with Shaikh's Article
The works of Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri were highly acclaimed by Shaikh Deedat which he has referred to in his letters he wrote to the Shaikh from South Africa.  This is totally an independent source.

Please see the scan copies of these letters placed on the following location of Shaikh's website. IPCI is not part of CIFIA. It is an independent Organization and the Head of the Organization Shaikh Deedat is recognizing the works of Shaikh.

(1) http://www.cifiaonline.com/scan0003.tif (2) http://www.cifiaonline.com/scan0002.tif (3) http://www.cifiaonline.com/scan0004.tif (4) http://www.cifiaonline.com/scan0005.tif

The above are not references of Shaikh's website. These are scan copies of Shaikh Deedat's letters recognizing Shaikh Quadri's work.

See more reference on Internet.

(5) On Internet, Islamic Organizations feel it is prestige if their Website is listed on CIFIA. See this reference - http://www.sufi.co.za/

(6) Shaikh's Articles listed on this Arabic Website http://alsufia.org/showthread.php?p=73198

(7) http://www.shariaa.net/forum/archive/index.php/t-16375.html (Shaikh's Article discussed and appreciated on the above Forum which has several thousand members).

(8)Shaikh's Articles listed on this Arabic Website http://www.shariaa.net/forum/showthread.php?t=16375

(9) Shaikh's Articles on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=136808169673532

(10) Shaikh's Articles discussed on another forum on Internet Awliya-e-Hind.com - http://kgn786.com/forum/index.php?action=printpage;topic=13655.0

(11)Shaikh's Articles listed on the following Website http://www.museumstuff.com/learn/topics/Ahmed_Deedat::sub::Debates

(12) Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri on Facebook France http://fr-fr.facebook.com/pages/Shaikh-Mir-Asedullah-Quadri/146870918664650

(13)Correct Islamic Faith Group on Facebook. This was started by young Muslims. http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=136808169673532&topic=266

(14) Another Website calling Shaikh's work as excellent. http://sunniforum.net/showthread.php?p=13904

(15) Many of the Shaikh's Articles listed on this Blog http://omssislam.blogspot.com/2010_09_15_archive.html

(16) Many of Shaikhs Articles are listed and debated on this Forum which has over 15000 members http://kgn786.com/forum/index.php?topic=15038.0

(17)Even other sects appreciate Shaikh's work. See this website - http://sufism.bahaifaith.info/ (18)Shaikh Biography listed on this website http://reference.findtarget.com/search/Mir%20Asedullah%20Quadri/

(19)Cifia listed on this blog many many times. http://omssislam.blogspot.com/2010_09_18_archive.html

(20) The Forum with 15000 or more members discussing Shaikh's Articles http://kgn786.com/forum/index.php?topic=11133.0

(21) Shaikh's biography listed on this Website http://private-interest-foundation.info/news/Mir-Asedullah-Quadri.html

(22) Shaikh has a lot of respect among Ahle Sunnah, See bottom lines of this page on Internet. http://www.sunniport.com/masabih/showthread.php?p=29020 (23)Shaikh listed as Islamic Scholar - see this website http://www.ask.com/wiki/Islamic_Scholars

'''I hope the above should be sufficient for the time being. All these references will be provided on his page.'''

Guide99 (talk) 12:27, 17 December 2010 (UTC)--Guide99 (talk) 12:27, 17 December 2010 (UTC)


 * See my explanation on the article's talk page. Again, none of those sources meet WP:RS (reliable sources).  Find us a major newspaper article, a scholarly book about Islam in Asia, and that will constitute at least basic proof of notability.  Note however that this still would not mean "find one single external ref and then just re-dump direct quotes from CIFA itself all over the rest of the page."  If you can't find at least one external ref, the article will be deleted again, and will be (much more promptly in the future) deleted if it is re-started without establishing WP:NOTABILITY.  Either you can find mention of this man in the independent media, or you cannot.  I have looked all over Google and cannot find a reliable, neutral source. MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Your pathetic attitude and clear cut bullying
I had put a tag to contest the proposed deletion. You should have allowed it be seen and judged by some unbiased and neutral Administrators and then decide upon it. But, in the quickest haste, you removed the tag. You seem to have formed a biased group to bully people on Wikipedia and are using your leverage with Wikipedia wrongly, in a dictatorial manner.

Look into your conscience, you will know the truth.

I have provided outside references from many Islamic Institutions with physical addresses in the world about the Shaikh. They have appreciated his works on their official websites.''' Even one of such evidence is sufficient for Wikipedia while I have provided around 17.

In addition, I provided written evidence of Shaikh Deedat who is accepted by Wahhabis, Deobandis and Sunnis as an Islamic Scholar. He has appreciated Shaikh's work.

I provided appreciation of other sects, like Bhaiees (who are not related with Shaikh's work and preaching) Organization which they have put Shaikh's appreciation on their official website. They have physical address and phone numbers.

I provided evidences for American Management Association, British Institute of Management, Association of Business Executives of UK, where the Shaikh was member for many years. All these Institutions are real, physically existing and extremely popular in the world.

In spite of all these evidence, you think you can delete the Article. Alas, I do not understand what kind of logic you follow. I will indeed appeal against your arbitrary actions and I am sure I will get justice at Wikipedia. I know there are judicious people in Wikipedia who will sure disagree with what you are up to.

It is a good idea to convince people, rather than try to silence their voice by vandalism.

Guide99 (talk) 04:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)--Guide99 (talk) 04:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Your continued accusations of vandalism, and complete refusal to actually respond constructively to advice from other editors or to acknowledge reading basic WP standards are wearing thin. I will continue to watch and maintain the article, but I will no longer respond to your accusations unless you display a willingness to engage in actual discussion.  Throughout this entire process, you have not responded to any of the clear-cut explanations of how the article is lacking, but have instead basically argued the exact same assertions regardless of the detail with which they have been refuted.


 * I have put out considerable effort to help you, running Google searches on all possible variants of Quadri's name and of CIFA trying to find reputable sources (I did not). I have also given you detailed advice on which WP policies to read to avoid this sort of mess.  I have also given explicit explanations for why your "17 references" clearly do not meet the standards of WP:RS (blogs, sectarian sites, Facebook of all things).  If you are not going to accept advice I'm not going to get emotionally invested in trying to help you.  Have you not noticed that every editor you've run into, regardless of background or where you encountered them, has told you the exact same thing?  Do you think this is conspiracy?  Or perhaps consider that they're all taking into consideration the same basic Wikipedia procedures, and that is why their objections are so uniform.  By all means, feel free to go to other Wikipedia noticeboards or admins; they will all tell you the same thing.  If you continue to butt your head against the wall by refusing to take advice, you will continue to get the same result.  If, however, you take an hour or less to familiarise yourself with basic Wikipedia guidelines, you can avoid this entire hassle for the rest of your time on Wikipedia.  I honestly hope you do so. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:28, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 06:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Mir Asedullah Quadri. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Demiurge1000 (talk) 06:58, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 07:20, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for I have blocked you indefinitely, not just for disruptive editing, but also because I find the edit summary "Your repeated deletion of Shaikh's Article establishes your vandalism. Indeed you are a dedicated vandal. People will come to you about you sooner" a possible threat. If you wish to be unblocked you will need to explain this summary and agree to discuss changes on the talk page rather than try to force them into the article.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 08:09, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Guide99, do you also agree to stop calling editors vandals? Dougweller (talk) 10:54, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Why should I call anyone vandal. The only issue is about references on Shaikh's page. I have provided 36 solid references.  My only concern is his page.  Please restore this page, thanks.  All those who were in argument with me, can always be and become my friends. We all mature with our experiences.  Let us forget it once and for all and carry on with our product work.  Guide99 (talk) 13:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)--Guide99 (talk) 13:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Guide99, I'm curious to know whether you have now read through the various resources that have been suggested to you (e.g. WP:RS, but several others as well). Your participation on the article talk page will be more successful if you have become more familiar with the requirements for editing here.  Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:18, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, I have read WP:RS several times. I will quote you from that page here.

"Many Wikipedia articles rely on scholarly material. When available, academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly monographs, and textbooks are usually the most reliable sources."

In this context, I provided reference and appreciation letters of Shaikh Ahmad Deedat - These letters are indeed peer-review of the Books of Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri. These letters are signed by Shaikh Deedat himself.

As far as Text books are concerned, Shaikh sends many of his books to other scholars and libraries and Islamic Institutions. In return, they send letters of appreciation.

As far as Academic references are concerned, I provided references of top Management Institutions of the world (i) American Management Association, (ii) British Institute of Management, (iii) Association of Business Executives and others where Shaikh was member for several years.

I have provided "published" appreciation of the Shaikh on the official Websites of some very well known Islamic Institutions; some of them are in existence for decades and running many schools, etc. These are official Websites of these Islamic Institutions, therefore cannot be treated as 'general websites launched by individuals'. As a matter of fact to call these Institutions as "Websites" is wrong. These are Institutions and their official websites publish their views and other details.

www.cifiaonline.com is the official website of Correct Islamic Faith International Association which was jointly launched by many Islamic Institutions of the world. Today, it has 330 members and many scholars of Islam are its Associates. CIFIA is not a Website. It is an Association of literally all Ahle Sunnha of the world. Therefore, they claim that, with a rigid estimate, the followers of all Associate Scholars of Cifia, together, are more than 350 million. As far as I am concerned, this looks very authentic and genuine.

Shaikh does not like any kind of personal publicity. It is we, his fans and other Islamic Associations of the world who tell the world about him. We want more and more people to benefit from his person. He seldom talks to the press, very simple in his character and avoids media fan fare. But he is an ocean of Islamic knowledge. His understanding and explanations of Islamic issues are unique. Whatever he talks, is supported by Quran and Ahadith. If you sit in his company, you cannot cannot be unimpressed or unsatisfied. People like him are rare of the rarest in the world.

We can argue endlessly what can be treated as published and what not. But we need to be positive, and if you see the purpose of this article, then it will be easier for you to understand and accommodate information published on official websites of physically existing Islamic Institutions as "published".

Because information published in "Print Media" like newspapers and book" is same as published in "Electronic Media and Internet" as long as the publishing agency is physically existing, known, famous and genuine, having physical address, phone numbers, e-mail addresses, and names of Heads of their organizations. I have provided many such references in Shaikh's Article.

I hope you must have understood my point very clearly. And I will appreciate if you remove those tags and restore Shaikh's page.

I am giving you the Shaikh's page again that can be reviewed by all concerned.

Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri (الشيخ مير اسد الله قادري) is a Shaikh of Ahle Sunnah Wal Jama'a, Hanafi, known for his distinct explanations of Tawheed and Ilm-e-Sahih.

Shaikh's distinct way of teaching shows his knowledge to be practical, rather than theoretical. This will be testified by millions of people who read his Articles on Internet and who hear him talk. His explanations are always authenticated by references from Quran and Ahadith. He explains most difficult and complicated issues with unique style of ease which keeps the listeners/ readers spell bound.

Biography
Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri was born on 1st Jumada II, 1373 H, corresponding to February 5, 1954 in Hyderabad, India in Sadaat family (the direct descendants of Hazrat Ali - رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہ and Sayyida Fatimatuz Zahara - رضئ اللہ تعالی عنہا).

His father Hazrat Mir Momin Ali Quadri ® (1918-1972) was a famous Shaikh of his time who received Khilafah from two famous Shuyooks (i) Shaikh Mohammad Abdul Qadeer Siddiqui Quadri (Hasrat) ® (1871-1962) and (ii) Shaikh Badruddin Khaled Wajudi Quadri ® ( (1988-1879. Shaikh Mohammad Abdul Qadeer Siddiqui Quadri (Hasrat) ® is very famous Shaikh of Islam. He was Professor and Head of the Department of Islamic Studies at Osmania University, Hyderabad India for over 20 years, till 1932.

When Shaikh was born, Hazrat Siddiqui ® visited the the house of his parents and suggested the present name of the Shaikh. Shaikh carried out his religious studies as well as English school studies simultaneously. Shaikh studied Islamic subjects for 5 years at a famous Madrasa Deeniyat at Ahmednagar, Hyderabad and secured the Certificate while he was studying in high School.

In childhood Shaikh took ba'ya on the hands of Hazrat Abdul Qadeer Siddiqui ®. He had the honor of learning Islam under the able guidance of Shaikh Siddiqui  former Professor and Head of the Department of Theology, Osmania University, Hyderabad.

Shaikh was 20 years old, when his father died in 1972. In 1973, he took ba'ya on the hands of the most famous Shaikh of his time, Shaikh Badruddin Khaled Wajudi Quadri ®  (1979-1988) and had the opportunity to learn Islam, particularly Islamic theology under his able guidance. Shaikh Khaled Wajudi ®   gave Khilafah to the Shaikh in 1985.

After the death of Shakih Khaled® in 1988, Shaikh had the opportunity to learn Islam under the able guidance of Shaikh  Hussain Shujauddin Siddiqui (Izzat) (1909-1998) ®,     the son and successor of Shaikh  Mohammad Abdul Qadeer Siddiqui ®. Shaikh spent several hours every day in the company of Shaikh Shujauddin Siddiqui Quadri ®  for over 9 years. Shaikh received Khilafah from Shaikh Shujauddin Siddiqui in 1996. In 1976 Shaikh did Hajj for the first time. In 1978 He did Hajj for the second time. He visited the holy cities of Makka and Madina for Umra and Ziyara innumerable times and stayed in Madina Al-Munawwara for weeks at a stretch.

Right from his childhood Shaikh studied Islamic literature, particularly the exegesis of Quran, Ahadith and books of important Islamic personalities. Shaikh spent over 40 years in the company of famous Shuyooks of Ihsan learning Quran, Hadith, Fiqh and Islamic Theology. He had the opportunity to serve them and learn in their company the true meanings of Iman, Islam and Ihsan (the intrinsic spirit of Islam).

Shaikh says, " When I look back at my religious journey, I feel that I completed primary and middle School on Hazrat Mir Momin Ali Quadri's (r)hand; Higher Secondary and Intermediate Education on Hazrat Mohammad Abdul Qadeer Siddiqui's (r) hands; Graduation and post Graduation on Hazrat Badruddin Khaled Wajudi Quadri's (r) hands and Ph.D. and Post Doctoral Research on Hazrat Hussain Shujauddin Siddiqui's (r) hands. They guided me through all the stages (manaazil) in Sufi traditions - Shariah - Tareeqah - Ma'arefa - Haqeeqah."

General Education and Assignments
Shaikh completed Higher Secondary School in 1968, Pre-University Degree in 1971 and Bachelors degree in Business in 1975 from Osmania University, India. He took PG Diploma in International Marketing Management from the Institute of Marketing, London in 1983. He also secured Professional PG degree in General and Financial Administration from the Institute of Corporate Secretaries and Administrators, UK, in 1985.

He was member of the following professional bodies for many years. He was member of the following professional bodies for many years, like: (i)American Management Association, European Chapter, Brussels. (ii) British Institute of Management, London, UK. (iii) Institute of Corporate Sec. and Administrators, London. (iv) Association of Business Executives ,UK. He worked as General Manager, CEO and in other capacities in India, Saudi Arabia and Dubai.

Works
Shaikh is Head of CIF FOUNDATION, a registered NGO at Hyderabad, India, through which many activities like Islamic teaching and helping people are carried out by the Shaikh.

Shaikh is teaching Correct Islamic Faith to people for the past 30 years. In order to expand his teachings and spread the message of true Islam to every Muslim home in the world, Shaikh launched a Website correctislamicfaith.com in April, 2009. Almost all information on this site containing several thousand pages is written and compiled by him personally. The site has witnessed phenomenal success.

Shaikh’s biggest achievement is the establishment of Correct Islamic Faith International Association in 2009, as a joint effort of real Ahle Sunnah wal Jama'a to propagate Ilm-e-Sahih in the world. Currently CIFIA has 330 Associate Islamic Institutions and is undoubtedly the largest Islamic Association in the World.

Some of the world’s most well known scholars are Associates of Cifia. These include: (i) Dr. DrTahir-ul-Qadri, (ii) Shaikh Abdullah Al-Harariyy Al-Habashi ®, (iii) Shaikh Nazim Al-Haqqani, (iv) Shaikh Hisham Kabbani, (v) Shaikh Gibril Haddad, (vi) Shaikh Ahmad Darwish, (vii) Maulana Mohammad Ilyas Attar Qadri, (viii) Allama Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya), (ix) Shaikh Ali Zain Al-Abidin Al-Jifri, (x) Shaykh Muhammad al-Yaqoubi, (xi) Ustadh Zaid Shaker, (xii) Shaykh Hamza Yusuf Hanson, (xiii) Mufti Mohammad Faiz Ahmed Owaisi®, (xiv) Shaikh Bashir Farooqi Qadri, (xv) Mufti Akhtar Raza Khan Qadri, (xvi) Allama Sayyad Muhammad Madani Miya Ashrafi, (xvii) Allama Syed Badiuddin Soharwardy, (xviii) Allama Muhammad Hashmi Al-Ashraf. Most of the above scholars’ are also listed on Wikipedia and CIFIA.

Shaikh Ahmad Deedat (r) (1918-2005) and Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri had special intellectual friendship. Shaikh Deedat used to give a lot of respect to Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri and wrote many letters to him from his Islamic Propagation Center International appreciating his religious work. He used to send his books and booklets to the Shaikh from South Africa. Both these Shaikhs never met, but had great respect for each other and were in contact via letters and exchange of their books. We will briefly mention here about some of the last letters of Shaikh Ahmad Deedat (r) to Shaikh Asedullah Quadri.

On March 8, 1996, Shaikh Deedat (r) wrote to Shaikh Asedullah Quadri requesting English translation of his book 'Islamic Wisdom' to be sent to him, as (in the words of Shaikh Deedat - r) it will be a great assistance to him as he was writing a book with a similar title. In May 1996, Shaikh Asedullah Quadri sent him the Urdu book (Hikmat-e-Islamia authored by Shaikh Mohammad Abdul Qadeer Siddiqui - r) with the promise to send the English translation done by him which was under print at that time. Shaikh Asedullah Quadri's letter and the book reached Shaikh Deedat (r) on June 4, 1996, but by then Shaikh Deedat (r) had a severe paralytic stroke on May 3, 1996. The information about the stroke was sent to Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri by Qassim Deedat, Treasurer, IPCI in his letter dated 17th September 1996. . Thus, Shaikh Deedat (r) could not complete his proposed book titled "Wisdom".

Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri sent most of his books to IPCI, South Africa. Many of the books sent to Ahmad Deedat (r) were related to Tasawwuf and he was very happy to read them. Read Shaikh Deedat's (r) letter thanking Shaikh Asedullah Quadri after receiving the books.

Shaikh’s works are also recognized by following Islamic Institutions and they have placed it on their official websites. These Institutions are physically existing, have physical addresses and phone numbers given on their official Websites. Many of them are also running several Islamic Schools.


 * 1) Islamic Organizations feel it is prestige if their official Websites are listed on CIFIA. International Sufi Order, South Africa who are in existence for the past 100 years have appreciated Shaikh's works and feel it prestige to be listed on CIFIA. They have recognized Shaikh's services and placed it on their official Website.


 * 1) Shaikh's works are recognized and appreciated by Shaikh Ahmad Darwish, the most famous and acclaimed world known Hadith Scholar of our times who has offices in Cairo and Indonesia.  He has traveled all over the world extensively. ( Official Websites - Allah.com & Mohammad.com).  He has placed his appreciation on many of his websites.


 * 1) Shaikh's Biography is placed on this famous website


 * 1) Shaikh's Articles are regularly published on Sharia.net, a very famous Arabic Website  His Articles are also discussed on their forum regularly.  Their forum has over 30,000 members.


 * 1) Shaikh's biography and his articles are published by independent people, from India, France and other places.  There is also an independent 'Correct Islamic Faith Group on Face Book.


 * 1) Shaikh's biography has been listed on this famous websites


 * 1) Shaikhs Articles are discussed on many famous and prestigious Internet Forums who have between 15000 to 75000 members.

Books
Shaikh has written hundreds of big and small Articles on various subjects in Islam. Many of these are available on his Websites. These Articles are now being published as books and booklets from CIF FOUNDATION’S Publication Division.

Shaikh also published over 22 books in late ninetees and early 2000. Most of these books are English translations of various Islamic books written in Urdu by Shaikh Mohammad Abdul Qadeer Siddiqui Quadri (Hasrat) (r) former Professor and Head of the Department of Islamic Studies, Osmania University, India. Books from 1-13 are also available for free download Books from 14-22 will also be made available for free download soon. However, all these books are available in the market and in major libraries of the world.
 * 1) The Court of Prophethood and Cascade of Apostleship p65) (Darbar-e-Nuboowat wo Abshaare Risaalat) published in January 2002.
 * 2) The Issues of Usury and Divorce. p65 (Matha’la-e-Sood aur Talaaq) published in March 2002.
 * 3) The Call of Discernment of Truth.p65 (Sadaa-e- Ma’arefat - e - Haq ) published in September 2001.
 * 4) Gnoses - I. p65 (Al-Ma’aref - 1) published in August 2002.
 * 5) Schedule of Deeds of Sprindicants. p65 (Nizamul Amal Fuqara’a) Published in October 2001.
 * 6) Monotheism. p65 (At-Tawheed) Published in October 2001.
 * 7) Will and the Inheritance. p65 (Wasi'at wo Viraasat) Published in July 2001.
 * 8) The Fact of Accession. p65 (Haqeeqat-e-Me'raj) Published in August 2001.
 * 9) The Disputes among the Companions. p65 (Mushaajiraat-e-Sahaba Wo Ikhtilaafaat-e-A’imma) Published in December 2001.
 * 10) The Schools of Thoughts in the Discernment of Truth.p65 (Makaatib-e-Irfaan) Published in March 2002.
 * 11) The Servant of Allah. p65 ( Abdullah ) Published in August 2001.
 * 12) The Mirror of Truth. p65 (Mira'atus Sidq) Published in December 2001.
 * 13) The Fact of Promigiance. p65 (Promise of Allegiance) (Haqeeqat-e-Bait) Published in July 2001
 * 14) Islamic Wisdom (Hikmat-e-Islamia) .  This books was published in January 1998 and its hard copy is available in the market.
 * 15) Principles of Islam ( Usool-e-Islam) . This book was published in January 1996 and its hard copy is available in the market.
 * 16) The Exception, Preservation and Non-Abrogation of Holy Quran (E'jaz, Hifaazat aur Udam Nasqul Quran) . This book was published in December 1997 and its hard copy is available in the market.
 * 17) Siddiqui's Elucidations (Taf-heemaat-e-Siddiqui) .  Two editions of this book have been published so far. The first edition was published in June 1995 and the second edition was published in January 1996. Hard copy of its second edition is available in the market.
 * 18) Audition (Sam'a) . This book was published in June 2001.
 * 19) Siddiqui's Enunciations on Islamic Righteousness (Irshaadaat-e-Siddiqui) http://www.cifiaonline.com/-%20Book%20Scans/Siddiqui%27s%20Elucidations%20of%20Islamic%20righteousness.tif . This Book was published in October 2001.
 * 20) Siddiqui's Exegesis (Chapter -1) (Tafseer-e-Siddiqui - Sura Al- Fatiha) . This book was published in November 2001.
 * 21) The Assertions and Their Consequences (Qaulun Faslun) - This book was published in January 2002.
 * 22) Gnoses - II.p65 (Al-Ma’aref - Part - 2) - This book was published in December, 2002.

Shaikh is a poet in Urdu and English. Collection of his Hamd, Naats and other Islamic Urdu poetry titled 'Ihsaa-sisthaan-e-Ased. .  Some of the samples of 'Hamd' (Praise of Allah Ta'ala) written by the Shaikh in English and Urdu are available on his Website.

Shaikh has written a comprehensive book titled 'The understanding of Islamic Faith and Practice' which was published 2002. .

Shaikh also compiled Urdu Collection of Islamic poetry (600 pages) written by Hazrat Badruddin Khaled Wajudi (r) his Shaikh and teacher, titled "Khiyalistaan-e-Khaled", in 2000 AD. He is currently writing English translation and exegesis of the holy Quran. This exegesis is made available on his Website in instalments.

Shaikh has 2 sons and 3 daughters.

Sock puppetry
Please see WP:Sock puppet. Trying to get around your block by creating a new account may mean that you are never unblocked. Is this what you want? Dougweller (talk) 13:53, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Mir Asedullah Quadri for deletion
The article Mir Asedullah Quadri is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mir Asedullah Quadri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Scott Mac 15:46, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 16:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri


Hello Guide99. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Shaikh Mir Asedullah Quadri.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)