User talk:Guilherme Styles

May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=557750262 your edit] to Monarchy of Belgium may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Swedish errors
Hello! When editing the Swedish Royal Family recently, you made a lot of errors, in conrtent as well as proper Wikipedia format. John Ambler, for example is deceased. Please be more careful! Thanks! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 01:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monarchy of the Netherlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prince Henry of the Netherlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Royal families edits
Guilherme Styles, please start using edit summaries and start responding to other users' concerns that your edits are inappropriate. You have been making lots of unhelpful edits recently, and none of your edits has had a summary. You have been warned countless times that your edits are not productive, but you have not bothered to repond to any of those warnings. Can we please discuss this matter? Surtsicna (talk) 23:49, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm AstroChemist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! EzPz (talk) 00:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Please stop making disruptive edits. You are repeatedly inserting factually inaccurate and terribly spelled text into articles and ignoring all the attempts to contact you. You have already been blocked for this. Do you intend to cooperate at all? Surtsicna (talk) 21:20, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at British Royal Family, you may be blocked from editing. —    Bill W.     (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 03:31, 25 June 2013 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. EzPz (talk) 03:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danish Royal Family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Princess Alexandra of Greece and Denmark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Erroneous changes to articles subject to the WP:Biographies of living persons policy
Hello Guilherme Styles. As you can see from the comments above, several people are concerned that you are adding factual errors to articles, especially about European royal families. You are expected to respond to reasonable concerns about your edits. You have never left a comment on any talk page and you don't use any edit summaries to explain what you're doing. Please be aware that you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia for reasons of WP:COMPETENCE. It's in your interest to respond here to the concerns that people have expressed. If you continue without any explanation, you may be blocked. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 22:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! That needed to be said. Sincerely, --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:32, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Edit warring and unsourced changes to royal family articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Per a complaint at User talk:EdJohnston. If you continue to make erroneous changes to WP:BLP articles without responding to others' concerns, you may be indefinitely blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 23:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at British Royal Family, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —    Bill W.     (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 21:39, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wedding guests of Charles, Prince of Wales, and Lady Diana Spencer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Fellowes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wedding of Victoria, Princess Royal, and Prince Frederick of Prussia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Princess Marie of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphans
Hi there, I came across various articles you have created about royal weddings, as they had been tagged as orphans. Orphans (on wikipedia) are articles that are not linked to any other article, therefore it is diffcult for readers to find them unless they specifically search the name of the article. I have linked your articles and deorphaned them, but try to remember to do the same to any new articles you create in future... otherwise people may never see your good work! - Bleaney (talk) 13:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wedding of Princess Louise and John Campbell, Marquess of Lorne


A tag has been placed on Wedding of Princess Louise and John Campbell, Marquess of Lorne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Princess_Louise,_Duchess_of_Argyll. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dog six (talk) 04:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Wedding of Princess Louise and John Campbell, Marquess of Lorne. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dog six (talk) 05:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. See [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive837#Guilherme_Styles.27_IPs an April 27 report at ANI]. Lots of style edits about royalty that are against consensus, using random IPs from northwest Mexico. The talk page of his registered account contains earlier reports of factual errors when editing these articles. He never responds to any concerns and continues regardless. EdJohnston (talk) 03:37, 2 May 2014 (UTC)