User talk:GuillermoHin

Your submission at Articles for creation: Negative methane (February 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Negative methane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Negative_methane Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HitroMilanese&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Negative_methane reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Editor,
 * The subject cannot be fully referenced because is a report on a new discovery, a scientific discovery. The three references to scientific papers I provided are the only three references available in the current literature. One of them is an open access paper and therefore, can be read without
 * paying any subscription. My article has the same scientific rigor as the three references I provided (that I wrote myself). In conclusion, there are no more references in the subject. The only three references available in the subject are already given: the first report (PSST), the discovery confirmation and quantum mechanical model (PRL) and a full description (IJPB, open acess publication) of the field. 187.253.121.134 (talk) 02:20, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Negative methane
Hello, GuillermoHin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Negative methane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Negative methane has been accepted
 Negative methane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Negative_methane help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message and for the editorial effort dedicated to my article. Since I am new to wikipedia, I find difficult to comply to the criticisms by the editors. While this is a recent discovery, the subject is not that new. Reports on the scientific literature date from 2014 to 2021. I wanted to promote my discovery on wikipedia, because most of the scientific literature on the subject I have published it on specialized subscription journals. This is what I can reply:
 * -- "... the article need attention from an expert in Chemistry" I can think of any of my co-authors. Like, A. Ramirez-Solis or H. Saint'Martin who are experts on Quantum Chemistry. Any other expert will be fine with me. How do I ask them to check the article? I am the corresponding author on the original report (Journal Plasma Science Sources and Technology, 2014) the first author is my student and a co-author in the next two papers.
 * -- "... the article is an orphan ..." This is a complete new property of methane. I will try to link methane. Yet there does not exist an article on negative ions to link to. I would be happy to try to write it too...
 * -- "article written as a personal reflection ...". If they could provide the specific parts where this happens...
 * Thanks for your time and attention.
 * Guillermo Hinojosa A. GuillermoHin (talk) 18:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)