User talk:Guillermo Alonso Martínez Espinoza

Skanska
You seem to have inserted incorrectly sourced information into this article. The figure for the number of employees is shown on page 25 of the annual report as 33,225. Dormskirk (talk) 00:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Hancock Whitney
Please read WP:CITE and WP:RS before making any further changes to wikipedia. The information you have added has created a mixture of 2017 financials, which is properly sourced (see footnote), and 2019 financials which is not sourced. Dormskirk (talk) 00:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to NovaGold Resources—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 14:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boaz Weinstein. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 23:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Farmacias Benavides, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  — 🍊 Paper9oll  🍊 (📣 • 📝)  14:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Melvin Capital, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hakken (talk) 20:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

FirstGroup
You seem to have inserted out of date information into this article. The figure for the number of employees is shown on page 159 of the annual report as 103,494. In my experience Macrotrends is not a reliable source and in this instance are quoting a figure, which although listed as 2020, is out of date. There have been significant reductions in many UK businesses as a result of Covid-19. Dormskirk (talk) 10:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Essar Group, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cantor Fitzgerald.   Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 08:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Adding unsourced info without edit summaries
Hi - I just went through some of your more recent edits and see that you are still not adding sources for the info you are adding, despite several requests. I see a lot of reverted info in your edit history, suggesting that you are making more work for others. This was your most recent edit to add unsourced info. [] I added a few sources to try to support your earlier additions [] [], and removed info that can't be easily sourced []. Since you are somehow getting the information including numbers that you are adding, please be considerate and include the source, so the info can be easily verified. Otherwise, putting in unsourced info can weaken the reliability of the encyclopedia. Here's info about adding sources Citing sources. Please also start using edit summaries so we can see what you did. If you continue to add unsourced information, you may be blocked from editing. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  20:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

HSBC - unsourced information on assets under management
Hi - Please read our guidelines before undertaking any more editing: in particular please read WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:RS. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 20:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Happy Day- Can you help me and let's be friends Guillermo Alonso Martínez Espinoza (talk) 14:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi - The best think you can do is read and follow our guidelines and then we can all be friends. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. signed,Rosguill talk 01:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * After having received the prior requests from other editors to stop adding content without providing proper sources or explaining your edits in edit summaries, you proceeded to make these changes at Northern Trust. Communication is not optional on Wikipedia. If you do not respond to messages identifying problems with your edits, and you continue to repeat the same problems, you will lose your editing privileges. signed,Rosguill talk 01:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

{unblock|reason=Your reason here There is no evidence of wrongdoing and User:Rosguill|Rosguill]] (talk) where you get the rights to do so. To get the rights you need to get approved. And also I will check Rosguill if you have done any disruptive editing.} --Guillermo Alonso Martínez Espinoza (talk) 03:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 09:49, 09 March 2021 (UTC)

No evidence
Dear User:Rosguill|Rosguill]] (talk) I have been incriminated without evidence in my account of which the disruptive editing was not taken as a message but as an attack in which it is as an offense. Which it says in Wikipedia Private Policy is a right. Also, I am not really violating internet laws but even this is an international issue. So please tell the evidence against me a law article, etc. --Guillermo Alonso Martínez Espinoza (talk) 04:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC) 10:02, 09 March 2021 (UTC)

My Evidence
Rosguill User:Rosguill|Rosguill]] (talk)

March 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 10:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You got unblocked less than two days ago and you're back to adding vast amounts of unsourced content to articles. I strongly suggest you read WP:RS and WP:CITE over the next week or you will find yourself indefinitely blocked from editing.  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 10:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add edit summaries and sources
I see that you are still adding info without sources and edit summaries, such as with this edit []. While the info appears to be correct, if you don't add sourcing or edit summaries, you are making extra work for others trying to verify the info that you add. Please add edit summaries and sources, or you may be permanently blocked. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  20:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Citing sources correctly
Hi, I noticed that you added HTML plain links as sources at ING Group. This is not good practice according to WP:CS:EMBED. Please take a moment to read Citing sources and to provide complete citations of the material your are sourcing your contributions to. This will benefit readers and allow other contributors to check the reliability of your sources rapidly. Cheers. JBchrch (talk) 16:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Next plc
Thanks for contributing to the article Next plc. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you.. Please also note that you added 2020 financial data when 2021 financial data was available and had already been added to other infobox parameters. Dormskirk (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Quicken Loans
 * added a link pointing to Holding
 * Rock Ventures
 * added a link pointing to Holding

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Adding unsourced info without edit summaries - again
With this edit [], you added incorrect subsidiaries, without a source, and as usual, didn't include an edit summary. You are making more work for other editors. This is your final warning. If you keep adding sourced (or even unsourced) info without edit summaries, you will be reported at WP:ANI, and will likely be permanently blocked from editing. TimTempleton <sup style="color:#800080">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  06:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. <b style="color:#7F007F">TimTempleton</b> <sup style="color:#800080">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  23:40, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 01:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked for continuing the same behavior that got them blocked before--unexplained edits (no edit summaries, no proper communication with others), unverified edits (or edits with spam/spammy links), and a general kind of lack of competence demonstrated on this talk page and in various edits. Drmies (talk) 01:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)