User talk:Guldal

Ways to improve Society for Design and Process Science
Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. Guldal, thanks for creating Society for Design and Process Science!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references from independent reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 22:02, 15 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello Crystallizedcarbon. Thank you for the information, but MER-C has been deleted without any notification. What can we do to retrieve what has been done? He said the reason is copyright. We can provide anything necessary. Contacting to me will be enough to satisfy Wikipedia rules SerkanGuldal@sdpsnet.org. Thank you for cooperation and collaboration. --Guldal (talk) 19:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MER-C 08:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I am an active member of society. It is a 20 year society and I am helping people to learn from Wikipedia. You are deleting 3 days work in a matter of second. Thank you for discouragement!!!
 * Do you mind consider to ask for any proof before deleting everything.
 * Contact for whatever you need to do make your job right SerkanGuldal@sdpsnet.org --Guldal (talk) 14:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Did you even read what you dumped into Wikipedia? Let me quote: "SDPS 2015 Dallas will celebrate the 20th anniversary of the Society for Design and Process Science. We invite all industries, governments, educational and research institutions, entrepreneurs, engineers, managers, medical professionals... ". There are two obvious (non-copyright) problems with this text; if you can't spot either of them, you shouldn't be editing. MER-C 04:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * That is just started it will be perfected very quickly. Why didn't you warn us, so we can get the copy of what we "dumped". That drives me crazy. You would delete it later to satisfy yourself not Wikipedia rules. You don't have right to boss people!
 * Anyway, What happened, happened. what should we do to make the society's Wikipedia web page? --Guldal (talk) 04:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * What do you need for copyright? --Guldal (talk) 04:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I have recreated the SDPS webpage again. Please feel free contact me for anything. Your cooperation and guidance will be greatly appreciated.

Speedy deletion nomination of Society for Design and Process Science


A tag has been placed on Society for Design and Process Science, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Society of Design and Process Science - SDPS - padded logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Society of Design and Process Science - SDPS - padded logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SwisterTwister  talk  22:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)