User talk:Gullujani

May 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Himatnagar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 17:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Himatnagar. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 17:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Himatnagar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 18:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Page block
I'm sorry, but your edits to Himatnagar are inappropriate for an encyclopedia, both in substance and in language. You have been blocked from editing that article. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 18:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC).