User talk:Gulumeemee/Archive 2016

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xiangshan, Taipei has been accepted
 Xiangshan, Taipei, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Xiangshan,_Taipei help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of Crux Mathematicorum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crux Mathematicorum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Crux Mathematicorum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS 4444 Talk  06:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your changes on 2 (number)
Thanks for adding all the missing references to many number properties... That was a lot of work.

But I would like to know why you changed  the third and fifth Perrin numbers. into the second and fourth Perrin numbers, when the page on perrin numbers and the OEIS sequence, both give this list: 3, 0, 2, 3, 2, 5, 5, 7, 10... Although in OEIS, the first index is 0, you would have to name 3 the zeroth Perrin number, and that doesn't sound right. Dhrm77 (talk) 14:09, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

The article 616 (number) has a similar problem. You list 616 as the 29th member of the Padovan sequence, when it looks like it is the 30th member according to OEIS and the 25th member according to wikipedia's Padovan sequence, unless you want to name the first 1 as the zeroth member... Please explain your edits. Dhrm77 (talk) 00:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * 12 was listed as the ninth Perrin number, 17 was listed as the tenth Perrin number, and 39 was listed as the thirteenth, making 3 the zeroth. I tried to make it more consistent by listing 2 as the second and fourth Perrin numbers. The Padovan sequence starts at different places in Wikipedia and OEIS. I thought it would also start at the zeroth number in the OEIS. Gulumeemee (talk) 01:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC) I forgot to check the Wikipedia article on the Padovan sequence to see if the sequence starts in the same place there. Gulumeemee (talk) 03:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Personally, I don't really like the use of "zeroth number", that just seems wrong...
 * Regarding the Padovan sequence, since there doesn't seem to be a consensus regarding where the sequence starts, maybe we shouldn't mention at all the place of any number in that sequence, just saying that it is part of the sequence. What do you think? Dhrm77 (talk) 13:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I think we can just say that it appears in the Padovan sequence. Gulumeemee (talk) 03:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

"ryle number"
Yes, that was vandalism by 24.86.75.141 dating back to 2009: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A24.86.75.141&type=revision&diff=306859372&oldid=207227200

That user also vandalised 7 (number) back in 2008 with the same thing, and no explanation.... https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7_(number)&diff=prev&oldid=207199432

Thanks for fixing that long-standing piece of mis-information. Dhrm77 (talk) 18:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Genetically modified fish
Hi Gulumeemee, I removed this sentence because it was exactly repeated twice in the same paragraph. I judged that the second use of it was unintentional.

"Others have claimed the sterility process has a failure rate of 5%.[34] "

Best, Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peej03 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I removed the sentence. In the future, you can explain your edits in the edit summary. Gulumeemee (talk) 02:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)


 * This discussion should have taken place on the talk page of GMO fish so others can find it (Talk:Genetically_modified_fish). Can one of you move it there, please?  In the edit note, it says, "user explained it", but since it is not on the talk page, editors have no idea what explanation was made.  So we have to go the extra step to hunt it down to find the explanation here.  Yes, I agree the explanation would have been better in the edit note the first time, but since it is not it should go to the article talk page.  Thanks. Ping to .  --David Tornheim (talk) 23:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I moved the discussion. Gulumeemee (talk) 04:39, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Note about a revert you made that was caused by this IP address
This IP address I'm posting from belongs to Sprint Wireless (for their mobile devices). I thought I'd let you know that someone in the past with a mobile device (or an app that did it intentionally) probably had decided to vandalize at some point in time. I'm being kind by posting this (and hoping whoever, or whatever, did this doesn't do it again). Note that I only came on Wikipedia and noticed it today, which is surprising me as I refuse to do such self-centered tasks. 66.87.113.72 (talk) 01:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Note on Joshua Claybourn
I did not create an article about myself. But after seeing someone else did, I provided some cosmetic changes to things such as citation layout, etc. However, I agree that I should avoid editing that page in any way and will refrain in the future.--YHoshua (talk) 13:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging of Vahanchalak
Hello Gulumeemee. You tagged "Vahanchalak" for speedy deletion, but you did not notify the article's creator that it had been so tagged. There is strong consensus that the creators of articles tagged for speedy deletion should be warned and that the person placing the tag has that responsibility. All of the major speedy deletion templates contain a pre-formatted warning for this purpose—just copy and paste to the creator's talk page. Thank you.--Savonneux (talk) 04:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I will warn creators of articles that I tag for speedy deletion in the future. Gulumeemee (talk) 06:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

What do you mean?
I was assigned to format a page as that is my job. What am I doing is not vandalism as I am just formatting a page as requested. Please do not associate me with vandalism as I am not a criminal. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IcedMikeTV (talk • contribs) 06:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Why?
Why have you tagged my page to be deleted? that's so unfair!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by VoicefanAu (talk • contribs) 10:05, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Per Criteria for speedy deletion, the creator of a page may not remove a speedy deletion tag from it. You have already contested the speedy deletion. An administrator will decide if the page will be deleted. Gulumeemee (talk) 10:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletions of Tate and Kinazu
This article encourages thousands to think of the possiblities. If you delete this you are a horrible person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tateandkinazu (talk • contribs) 04:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

DYK for South Penghu Marine National Park
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting me back
I accidentally messed up where I put my comments intended for the discussion page on UNICEF in the article Halloween thanks so much for fixing this my wife is helping me learn to use a computer.

Peace out yo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.3.28.169 (talk) 15:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Greek to English translation
I don’t understand what’s wrong with my editing of Anna Vissi pages? FlujoDeLuz (talk) 11:18, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't know that you were translating from Greek to English. I thought it was vandalism. Gulumeemee (talk) 01:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Malayan whistling thrush
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Taiwan whistling thrush
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

DYK for White-eared night heron
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Rollback
I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AGulumeemee granted] the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 09:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

DYK for White-backed night heron
Materialscientist (talk) 00:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:25, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The white-eared night heron is not actually found in Taiwan, but I did expand Taiwan whistling thrush, a species endemic to Taiwan. Gulumeemee (talk) 03:10, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Orange ground thrush
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Accidental Edit? .. Sorry, I never edit Wiki pages.
Hi Gulumeemee, Thanks for cleaning any mess that I may have accidentally made. I never edit Wikipedia pages -- no account + not sure how I got into edit mode! 38.140.169.114 (talk) 18:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC) CJHunt 2016.11.26
 * It may have been because someone used the same IP address as you. Gulumeemee (talk) 05:05, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Oberländer's ground thrush
Hello Gulumeemee, just reading your DYK for the above. I was wondering if there was any suitable link for "undescribed" because it means something quite specific in this case. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I found species description and undescribed taxon, but they don't seem very suitable because the description of a taxon is not exactly what is meant here. Gulumeemee (talk) 08:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, well thanks for trying. It's a shame the hook can't be rephrased in a such a way to make its meaning clearer to non-experts... The Rambling Man (talk) 19:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Oberländer's ground thrush
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Link a review website
Hi Gulumeemee, This is Philips. I have a review website for amazon affiliate. http://backpackninja.com. I want to linking the website with Wikipedia. Could you please advice how can I link.

Best regards Philips — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wphilips (talk • contribs) 19:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Per External links, external links should not be used for promotion, and the external links you were adding seemed promotional and looked like external link spamming. Gulumeemee (talk) 06:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Hairy-breasted barbet
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

173.50.77.237
Thanks for reverting them, I'm assuming that this IP is some sort of bot... 73.96.114.191 (talk) 05:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It is probably a vandalbot. Gulumeemee (talk) 05:45, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

FYI
Saw your revert here. Seen any similar behavior elsewhere (perhaps another article)? Opened an SPI case here. --JustBerry (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Bearded scrub robin
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 14:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)