User talk:GumpertTheGoat

November 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Alex Hirsch has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alex Hirsch was changed by GumpertTheGoat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936868 on 2014-11-26T22:00:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Hirsch. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 22:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Hirsch, you may be blocked from editing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 22:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Awesome Sauce Hirsch


A tag has been placed on Alex Awesome Sauce Hirsch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  21:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gravity Falls has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gravity Falls was changed by GumpertTheGoat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929236 on 2015-02-11T00:30:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Gravity Falls with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a &#123;&#123;Talkback&#125;&#125; message on my talk page. @ 00:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Gravity Falls shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 02:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gravity Falls. --Mr Fink (talk) 21:06, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dik-dik has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dik-dik was changed by GumpertTheGoat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911141 on 2016-03-01T03:05:21+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Xylophone. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Jacona (talk) 03:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Xylophone, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Xylophone was changed by GumpertTheGoat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904185 on 2016-03-01T03:07:59+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:08, 1 March 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

--GumpertTheGoat (talk) 03:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC) . ಥ_ಥ