User talk:GunAchi

Speedy deletion nomination of John Mark Bartolome


A tag has been placed on John Mark Bartolome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 09:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your article about John Mark Bartolome
Hi GunAchi. Many thanks for your contributions about Asian artists. Your input is appreciated to ensure Wikipedia has globally balanced contents from all regions. Having said that, WP has a number of policies to ensure the encyclopaedia is relevant and unbiased. One of the key principles is notability of a topic (any person, artist, band, company, concept...), which is immediately followed by verifiability and depth of coverage of the claim of notability (i.e. is widely and persistently covered). For actors and band members, one of the key questions is: is it the person that is exclusively been covered, or is the actor/band member just mentioned as part of coverage about the movie/band. The band or movie itself should be notable. See WP:ENT. No one questions the achievements of the subject of your article, however, minimum standards must be met that apply to the article. For an article to be kept, editors must demonstrate with cited, reputable sources any statements made about the subject and evidence of notability. I hope this helps. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 10:27, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to John Mark Bartolome have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to John Mark Bartolome was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/pages/Kuya-J-Internet-Cafe-Printing-Services/1138171969576371) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:21, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to John Mark Bartolome. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Your edit here to John Mark Bartolome was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olfLwVR2cKc) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of John Mark Bartolome for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Mark Bartolome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Mark Bartolome until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - MrX 23:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Mark Bartolome


A tag has been placed on John Mark Bartolome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 06:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with John Mark Bartolome. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 06:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to John Mark Bartolome. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Looking further at your editing history, I have found that, in addition to the issues mentioned in various messages above, some of your editing has included insertion of what you must have known were false claims into articles, which constitutes vandalism. Adding that to all the other problems with your editing, it has become clear that you are not benefiting the project, and are wasting a large amount of time for volunteers who have to clear up after you. You have therefore been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you believe there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)