User talk:Gundrak

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Eeekster. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:57, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Eeekster. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 23:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Umm, I'm not seeing a personal attack here. Falcon8765 (talk) 23:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User talk:Eeekster. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Eeekster (talk) 23:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 23:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Regarding warnings
I'm not sure how you're question on User talk: Eeekster's page is a personal attack.Falcon8765 (talk) 23:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

he keeps deleting my messages allthough im not attacking him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gundrak (talk • contribs)


 * Not attacking? You posted this: "You are not helping this website to grow, you are just commiting sabotage to wikipedia". Eeekster (talk) 23:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Be gentle with the new users Eeekster - and Gundrak try not to be as inflammatory. Falcon8765 (talk) 23:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

-Well you can just tell me what is wrong, right? And yes i read the "What is considered to be a personal attack?" section, i just can not get it how can you class this as a personal attack? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gundrak (talk • contribs)


 * He took offense at you telling him he was trying to sabotage the encyclopedia. He probably shouldn't have warned you about it, however you shouldn't blank pages. If you have an issue with the title of an article, discuss it on the articles talk page and work towards a compromise. Falcon8765 (talk) 23:21, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Well i didnt just blank the page first, i just changed it that i know right but he just didnt like it and undo the page, am i wrong eek? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gundrak (talk • contribs)


 * Looking at the edits in question, he was correct in reverting your edits. Wikipedia articles must use neutral wording, especially on contentious issues as is laid out on WP:NPOV. Terms like 'terrorist' are to be avoided, even if they are true they are abrasive terms. Additionally, your admitted IP was blocked by an Administrator who agreed with Eeekster's point of view. Falcon8765 (talk) 23:34, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

-Thank you for your time and your one-sided stance because i put a terrorism link there who declared this group as a terrorist organization.And what about "Terms like 'genocide' are to be avoided" who decides what is a genocide "UN" or you, admins? But most of all thank you for your time, i think im done here.