User talk:Gupta95ashish

Draft:Madan Mohan Temple
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Madan Mohan Temple, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.devasthan.rajasthan.gov.in/images/Karauli/madanmohanji.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madan Mohan Temple (March 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Madan Mohan Temple may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gupta95ashish Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gupta95ashish reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 20:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Madan Mohan Temple


A tag has been placed on Draft:Madan Mohan Temple requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://karauliroyals.blogspot.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 (talk) 20:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Hindaun, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. ''Your edits removed a large number of internal links and other material. So please don't make edits unless you know what you're doing.'' Thomas.W talk 15:41, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Jaipur Metro
Hello Gupta95ashish. I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your most recent changes to Jaipur Metro. Not because they were "bad", but because in making them, you destroyed some of the preexisting referencing, which caused all sorts of problems after your changes. Please take care when you make you changes that you don't "disrupt" the preexisting referencing (e.g. by changing reference "name" parameters unnecessarily) or remove references that are also used elsewhere in the article. Please feel free to add back the changes you made – just be careful this time that you make all of the existing references work with your changes. Thank you! --IJBall (talk) 15:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Dear IJBall, It is good that you are also contributing to this article. But I want to tell something that reverting all changes is not the solution. By doing this, you have destroyed my 4 hours work. You could change the references or you could say this to me before removing all contents. I'll remove them if this caused some inconvenience to you.
 * I made many such changes that are considered as symbol of a good article. What ever, I am reverting back my changes and also i am going to re create all references as you want, because I do not want my labor to be destroyed like this.
 * Take it lightly, Thank You. --Ashish (talk)
 * Ashish, please understand something – your contribution isn't "destroyed" when a reversion is made. It is still there in the article's reversion history – you can easily pick out the changes made, just by looking at the reversion differences (what's called a "diff") – e.g. diff. All the info you added is still right there, and you can simply copy and paste from the diff to get all your work back. Please also know that my reversion was nothing personal – I just wanted to make sure the referencing worked while you worked up a new version of your changes. Cheers! --IJBall (talk) 17:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah sure. Actually when I made my change, my internet got some problem and that is why I had to forced implement my edits. That causes problems in referencing. By the way as you can see I have fixed the issue.

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kota Hazrat Nizamuddin Jan Shatabdi Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bharatpur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Moved
I moved your new article to Draft:National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited because it dis not have any sources.--Chuka Chief (talk) 19:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * And i have deleted it as a copyright infringement of . Please do not, in future, copy text from elsewhere into Wikipedia articles. Content must be summarized in original words. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jaipur Metro Name Style
Template:Jaipur Metro Name Style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)